Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29534977›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2018

MetaGO: Predicting Gene Ontology of Non-homologous Proteins Through Low-Resolution Protein Structure Prediction and Protein-Protein Network Mapping.

Chengxin Zhang, Wei Zheng, Lydia Freddolino, Yang Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Artificial Intelligence Powers Protein Functional Annotation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Machine Learning for Protein Function Prediction.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chengxin ZhangDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Wei ZhengDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Lydia FreddolinoDepartment of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Yang ZhangDepartment of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: zhng@umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

Structure-based functional annotation of microbial genomesR01AI134678 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Lydia Petra Freddolino, SCOTT J. HULTGREN · 2018 to 2026
$6.5M
I-TASSER based atomic-level protein structure predictionR01GM083107 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, YANG · 2008 to 2019
$3.5M
Template-based docking refinement approach to protein-protein structure modelingR01GM116960 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, YANG · 2016 to 2019
$1.4M
Atomic-level, large-scale structure prediction of G protein-coupled receptorsR01GM084222 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZHANG, YANG · 2009 to 2012
$1.3M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI134678NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083107NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM084222NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM116960
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homology-based transferal remains the major approach to computational protein function annotations, but it becomes increasingly unreliable when the sequence identity between query and template decreases below 30%. We propose a novel pipeline, MetaGO, to deduce Gene Ontology attributes of proteins by combining sequence homology-based annotation with low-resolution structure prediction and comparison, and partner's homology-based protein-protein network mapping. The pipeline was tested on a large-scale set of 1000 non-redundant proteins from the CAFA3 experiment. Under the stringent benchmark conditions where templates with >30% sequence identity to the query are excluded, MetaGO achieves average F-measures of 0.487, 0.408, and 0.598, for Molecular Function, Biological Process, and Cellular Component, respectively, which are significantly higher than those achieved by other state-of-the-art function annotations methods. Detailed data analysis shows that the major advantage of the MetaGO lies in the new functional homolog detections from partner's homology-based network mapping and structure-based local and global structure alignments, the confidence scores of which can be optimally combined through logistic regression. These data demonstrate the power of using a hybrid model incorporating protein structure and interaction networks to deduce new functional insights beyond traditional sequence homology-based referrals, especially for proteins that lack homologous function templates. The MetaGO pipeline is available at http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/MetaGO/.

Indexed as

Gene OntologyProtein ConformationProtein Interaction MapsAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceComputational BiologyInternetModels, MolecularProtein Interaction MappingProteinsReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, ProteinSequence Homology, Amino AcidSoftwareProteinsGene Ontologyprotein function predictionprotein–protein interactionprotein structure predictionsequence profiles

Identifiers

PMID29534977
PMCPMC6014880
OpenAlexW2789559913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.