Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29534745›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2018

Mixed-method analysis of program leader perspectives on the sustainment of multiple child evidence-based practices in a system-driven implementation.

Adriana Rodriguez, Anna S Lau, Blanche Wright, Jennifer Regan, Lauren Brookman-Frazee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observed Engagement in Community Implemented Evidence-Based Practices for Children and Adolescents: Implications for Practice Delivery.Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53 · 2023
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adriana RodriguezDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA. arodriguez@psych.ucla.edu.
Anna S LauDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Blanche WrightDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jennifer ReganHathaway-Sycamores Child and Family Services, Pasadena, California, USA.
Lauren Brookman-FrazeeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.

Funding

Sustainment of Multiple EBP's Fiscally Mandate in Children's MH ServicesR01MH100134 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BROOKMAN-FRAZEE, LAUREN, LAU, ANNA SHAN-LAI · 2014 to 2018
$3.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH100134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding program leader perspectives on the sustainment of evidence-based practice (EBP) in community mental health settings is essential to improving implementation. To date, however, much of the literature has focused on direct service provider perspectives on EBP implementation. The aim of this mixed-method study was to identify factors associated with the sustainment of multiple EBPs within a system-driven implementation effort in children's mental health services.

methodsData were gathered from 186 leaders at 59 agencies within the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health who were contracted to deliver one of six EBPs within the Prevention and Early Intervention initiative.

resultsMulti-level analyses of quantitative survey data (N = 186) revealed a greater probability of leader-reported EBP sustainment in large agencies and when leaders held more positive perceptions toward the EBP. Themes from semi-structured qualitative interviews conducted with a subset of survey participants (n = 47) expanded quantitative findings by providing detail on facilitating conditions in larger agencies and aspects of EBP fit that were perceived to lead to greater sustainment, including perceived fit with client needs, implementation requirements, aspects of the organizational workforce, availability of trainings, and overall therapist attitudes about EBPs.

conclusionsFindings inform EBP implementation efforts regarding decisions around organizational-level supports and promotion of EBP fit.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEvidence-Based PracticeCaliforniaChildChild Health ServicesFemaleHumansOrganizationsProgram EvaluationSurveys and Questionnaireschildren’s mental health servicesEvidence-based practiceMixed-method analysisProgram leader perspectivesSustainment

Identifiers

PMID29534745
PMCPMC5850972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.