Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29534744›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2018

Impact of nighttime Rapid Response Team activation on outcomes of hospitalized patients with acute deterioration.

Shannon M Fernando, Peter M Reardon, Sean M Bagshaw, Damon C Scales, Kyle Murphy, Jennifer Shen, Peter Tanuseputro, Daren K Heyland, Kwadwo Kyeremanteng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Predictors of mortality and cost among surgical patients requiring rapid response team activation.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2020
    Article
  17. Does the Time of Solitary Rapid Response Team Call Affect Patient Outcome?Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shannon M FernandoDivision of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. sfern014@uottawa.ca.
Peter M ReardonDivision of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Sean M BagshawDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Damon C ScalesDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kyle MurphyDivision of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Jennifer ShenClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Peter TanuseputroClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Daren K HeylandDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Kwadwo KyeremantengDivision of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRapid Response Teams (RRTs) are groups of healthcare providers that are used by many hospitals to respond to acutely deteriorating patients admitted to the wards. We sought to identify outcomes of patients assessed by RRTs outside standard working hours.

methodsWe used a prospectively collected registry from two hospitals within a single tertiary care-level hospital system between May 1, 2012, and May 31, 2016. Patient information, outcomes, and RRT activation information were stored in the hospital data warehouse. Comparisons were made between RRT activation during daytime hours (0800-1659) and nighttime hours (1700-0759). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, analyzed using a multivariable logistic regression model.

resultsA total of 6023 RRT activations on discrete patients were analyzed, 3367 (55.9%) of which occurred during nighttime hours. Nighttime RRT activation was associated with increased odds of mortality, as compared with daytime RRT activation (adjusted OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.26-1.40, P = 0.02). The time periods associated with the highest odds of mortality were 0600-0700 (adjusted OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.09-1.61) and 2300-2400 (adjusted OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.01-1.56). Daytime RRT activation was associated with increased odds of intensive care unit admission (adjusted OR 1.40, 95% CI 1.31-1.50, P = 0.02). Time from onset of concerning symptoms to RRT activation was shorter among patients assessed during daytime hours (P < 0.001).

conclusionsAcutely deteriorating ward patients assessed by an RRT at nighttime had a higher risk of in-hospital mortality. This work identifies important shortcomings in health service provision and quality of care outside daytime hours, highlighting an opportunity for quality improvement.

Indexed as

Clinical DeteriorationAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHospital Rapid Response TeamHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNight CareOntarioOutcome Assessment, Health CareProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementCritical careIntensive care unitRapid Response TeamResuscitation

Identifiers

PMID29534744
PMCPMC5851273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.