Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29534719›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2018

Formation of chimeric genes with essential functions at the origin of eukaryotes.

Raphaël Méheust, Debashish Bhattacharya, Jananan S Pathmanathan, James O McInerney, Philippe Lopez, Eric Bapteste

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Raphaël MéheustSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Evolution Paris Seine - Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (EPS - IBPS), 75005, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4847-426X
Debashish BhattacharyaDepartment of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 08901, USA.
Jananan S PathmanathanSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Evolution Paris Seine - Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (EPS - IBPS), 75005, Paris, France.
James O McInerneyDivision of Evolution and Genomic Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, M13 9PL, Manchester, UK.
Philippe LopezSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Evolution Paris Seine - Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (EPS - IBPS), 75005, Paris, France.
Eric BaptesteSorbonne Universités, UPMC Univ Paris 06, CNRS, Evolution Paris Seine - Institut de Biologie Paris Seine (EPS - IBPS), 75005, Paris, France. eric.bapteste@upmc.fr.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEukaryotes evolved from the symbiotic association of at least two prokaryotic partners, and a good deal is known about the timings, mechanisms, and dynamics of these evolutionary steps. Recently, it was shown that a new class of nuclear genes, symbiogenetic genes (S-genes), was formed concomitant with endosymbiosis and the subsequent evolution of eukaryotic photosynthetic lineages. Understanding their origins and contributions to eukaryogenesis would provide insights into the ways in which cellular complexity has evolved.

resultsHere, we show that chimeric nuclear genes (S-genes), built from prokaryotic domains, are critical for explaining the leap forward in cellular complexity achieved during eukaryogenesis. A total of 282 S-gene families contributed solutions to many of the challenges faced by early eukaryotes, including enhancing the informational machinery, processing spliceosomal introns, tackling genotoxicity within the cell, and ensuring functional protein interactions in a larger, more compartmentalized cell. For hundreds of S-genes, we confirmed the origins of their components (bacterial, archaeal, or generally prokaryotic) by maximum likelihood phylogenies. Remarkably, Bacteria contributed nine-fold more S-genes than Archaea, including a two-fold greater contribution to informational functions. Therefore, there is an additional, large bacterial contribution to the evolution of eukaryotes, implying that fundamental eukaryotic properties do not strictly follow the traditional informational/operational divide for archaeal/bacterial contributions to eukaryogenesis.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the extent and process through which prokaryotic fragments from bacterial and archaeal genes inherited during eukaryogenesis underly the creation of novel chimeric genes with important functions.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticEvolution, MolecularPhylogenyChimeraEukaryotic CellsChimeric genesEndosymbiosisEukaryogenesisEvolutionary genomicsEvolutionary transition

Identifiers

PMID29534719
PMCPMC5851275
OpenAlexW2796988936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.