Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29534707›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2018

Putative salivary protein biomarkers for the diagnosis of oral lichen planus: a case-control study.

Sineepat Talungchit, Waranun Buajeeb, Chotima Lerdtripop, Rudee Surarit, Kongthawat Chairatvit, Sittiruk Roytrakul, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Yuichi Izumi, Siribang-On Piboonniyom Khovidhunkit

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Salivary Immune and Endocrine Biomarkers in Skin and Mucocutaneous Diseases.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Oral lichen planus: a microbiologist point of view.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Saliva and Oral Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sineepat TalungchitDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Waranun BuajeebDepartment of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chotima LerdtripopDepartment of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6 Yodhi St., Rajthewee, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.
Rudee SuraritDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Kongthawat ChairatvitDepartment of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sittiruk RoytrakulNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Hiroaki KobayashiDepartment of Periodontology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi IzumiDepartment of Periodontology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Siribang-On Piboonniyom KhovidhunkitDepartment of Advanced General Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, 6 Yodhi St., Rajthewee, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand. siribangon.pib@mahidol.edu.
Mahidol University · THTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPNational Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology · THSrinakharinwirot University · TH

Funding

Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (Thailand Research Fund) PHD/54/2550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSalivary protein biomarkers for screening and diagnosis of oral lichen planus (OLP) are not well-defined. The objective of this study was to identify putative protein biomarkers for OLP using proteomic approaches.

methodsPooled unstimulated whole saliva was collected from five OLP patients and five healthy control participants. Saliva samples were then subjected to two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, followed by mass spectrometry to identify putative protein biomarkers. Subsequently, a subset of these putative biomarkers were validated in 24 OLP patients and 24 age-matched healthy control subjects, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Immunoblotting analyses were then performed in 3 pairs of age- and sex-matched OLP patients and healthy controls to confirm results from the ELISA study.

resultsThirty-one protein spots were identified, corresponding to 20 unique proteins. Notably, fibrinogen fragment D and complement component C3c exhibited increased expression in OLP patients, while cystatin SA exhibited decreased expression in OLP patients, compared with healthy control subjects. ELISA analyses indicated increased expression of fibrinogen fragment D and complement component C3c, and decreased expression of cystatin SA, in the saliva of OLP patients. Statistical differences in the expression of salivary complement C3c were observed between OLP patients and healthy control subjects. Immunoblotting analyses confirmed the results of our ELISA study.

conclusionComplement C3c, fibrinogen fragment D and cystatin SA may serve as salivary biomarkers for screening and/or diagnosis of OLP.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesComplement C3cElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation ProductsHumansImmunoblottingLichen Planus, OralMaleMass SpectrometryMiddle AgedProteinsBiomarkersComplement C3cFibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Productsfibrinogen D fragmentProteinsSalivary CystatinsBiomarkersOral lichen planusSalivary proteins

Identifiers

PMID29534707
PMCPMC5851270
OpenAlexW2801582312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.