ReviewBiosensors2018
Biosensors for Sustainable Food Engineering: Challenges and Perspectives.
Review in Biosensors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sustainable Nanotechnology Approaches for Rapid Food Contaminant Detection and Future Food Safety Systems.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Next-Generation Bionic Sensors for Small Molecule Detection: Integrating Synthetic Biology, Nanomaterials, and Artificial Intelligence.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Transforming Coagulation Testing: The Role of Biosensors in Prothrombin Time (PT) Measurement.ACS omega · 2026Review
- Initiating the commercialization of genetically modified staple crops in China: domestic biotechnological advancements, regulatory milestones, and governance frameworks.GM crops & food · 2025Review
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Biosensors for Enhanced Detection of Foodborne Pathogens.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Development of a Generic Bio-Interface for Immuno-Biodetection on an Oxide Surface Targeting Pathogen Bacteria.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biopolymer-based electrospun nanofiber membranes for smart food packaging applications: a review.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Comprehensive Analysis of Advancement in Optical Biosensing Techniques for Early Detection of Cancerous Cells.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Optimization and characterization studies of poultry waste valorization for peptone production using a newly Egyptian Bacillus subtilis strain.AMB Express · 2025Article
- Trends of Nanobiosensors in Modern Agriculture Systems.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Review
- Biosensor in smart food traceability system for food safety and security.Bioengineered · 2024Review
- Continuous Biosensor Based on Particle Motion: How Does the Concentration Measurement Precision Depend on Time Scale?ACS sensors · 2024Article
- Biosensors for Public Health and Environmental Monitoring: The Case for Sustainable Biosensing.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2024Review
- The Application of Multi-Parameter Multi-Modal Technology Integrating Biological Sensors and Artificial Intelligence in the Rapid Detection of Food Contaminants.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Multimodal Biosensing of Foodborne Pathogens.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- A General Review of Methodologies Used in the Determination of Cholesterol (CFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Multiplex Detection of Biogenic Amines for Meat Freshness Monitoring Using Nanoplasmonic Colorimetric Sensor Array.Biosensors · 2023Article
- High-Throughput Single-Molecule Sensors: How Can the Signals Be Analyzed in Real Time for Achieving Real-Time Continuous Biosensing?ACS sensors · 2023Article
- Toward an Intelligent Blockchain IoT-Enabled Fish Supply Chain: A Review and Conceptual Framework.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Biopolymer Composites with Sensors for Environmental and Medical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current food production faces tremendous challenges from growing human population, maintaining clean resources and food qualities, and protecting climate and environment. Food sustainability is mostly a cooperative effort resulting in technology development supported by both governments and enterprises. Multiple attempts have been promoted in tackling challenges and enhancing drivers in food production. Biosensors and biosensing technologies with their applications, are being widely applied to tackling top challenges in food production and its sustainability. Consequently, a growing demand in biosensing technologies exists in food sustainability. Microfluidics represents a technological system integrating multiple technologies. Nanomaterials, with its technology in biosensing, is thought to be the most promising tool in dealing with health, energy, and environmental issues closely related to world populations. The demand of point of care (POC) technologies in this area focus on rapid, simple, accurate, portable, and low-cost analytical instruments. This review provides current viewpoints from the literature on biosensing in food production, food processing, safety and security, food packaging and supply chain, food waste processing, food quality assurance, and food engineering. The current understanding of progress, solution, and future challenges, as well as the commercialization of biosensors are summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.