Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29534538›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2018

Recent Advances in Zirconium-89 Chelator Development.

Nikunj B Bhatt, Darpan N Pandya, Thaddeus J Wadas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Evaluation of (1Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. From Desferrioxamine B Umpolung to an Enantiopure Bifunctional Chelator forChemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Radiotheranostic landscape: A review of clinical and preclinical development.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  11. Optimized production ofEJNMMI physics · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Preclinical Aspects of [Current radiopharmaceuticals · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Evaluation of Candidate Theranostics forJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nikunj B BhattDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. nbhatt@wakehealth.edu.
Darpan N PandyaDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. dapandya@wakehealth.edu.
Thaddeus J WadasDepartment of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA. twadas@wakehealth.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9913-0336

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interest in zirconium-89 (

Indexed as

AnimalsChelating AgentsDeferoxamineHumansMolecular StructurePositron-Emission TomographyRadioisotopesZirconiumChelating AgentsDeferoxamineRadioisotopesZirconiumZirconium-89chelatorpositron emission tomographyzirconium-89

Identifiers

PMID29534538
PMCPMC6017441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.