Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29534294›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2018

A group sequential test for treatment effect based on the Fine-Gray model.

Michael J Martens, Brent R Logan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael J MartensThe Emmes Corporation, Rockville, Maryland, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0003-3799-681X
Brent R LoganDivision of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0002-4473-4044

Funding

Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network DCC- The Medical College of Wisconsin, Inc.U24HL138660 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Steven M. DeVine, Mehdi Hussain Hamadani · 2017 to 2026
$71.4M
Easy-to-read Informed Consent for HCT Clinical TrialsU10HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2011 to 2016
$43.8M
City of Hope Core Clinical Center for the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials NetworkUG1HL069278 · NHLBI · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI RYOTARO NAKAMURA · 2017 to 2026
$2.2M
Competing Risks Analysis Methods for Group Sequential and Adaptive DesignsF31HL134317 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI MARTENS, MICHAEL JOHN · 2016 to 2016
$33k
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS F31 HL134317NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL069294NHLBI NIH HHS U24 HL138660NHLBI NIH HHS UG1 HL069278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competing risks endpoints arise when patients can fail therapy from several causes. Analyzing these outcomes allows one to assess directly the benefit of treatment on a primary cause of failure in a clinical trial setting. Regression models can be used in clinical trials to adjust for residual imbalances in patient characteristics, improving the power to detect treatment differences. But, none of the competing risks methods currently available for use in group sequential trials adjust for covariates. We propose a group sequential test for treatment effect that, because it is based on the Fine-Gray model, permits adjustment for covariates. Our derivations show that its sequence of test statistics has an asymptotic distribution with an independent increments structure, which allows standard techniques such as O'Brien-Fleming designs and error spending functions to be employed to meet type I error rate and power specifications. We demonstrate the test in a reanalysis of BMT CTN 0402, a phase III clinical trial that evaluated an experimental treatment for the prevention of adverse outcomes following blood and marrow transplant. Moreover, using a simulation study of randomized group sequential trials, we demonstrate that the proposed method preserves the type I error rate and power at their nominal levels in the presence of influential covariates.

Indexed as

Treatment FailureTreatment OutcomeBone Marrow TransplantationClinical Trials as TopicComputer SimulationEndpoint DeterminationHumansLong Term Adverse EffectsPeripheral Blood Stem Cell TransplantationRiskCompeting risks analysisCovariate adjustmentFine-gray regression modelGraft versus host diseaseGroup sequential designHematopoietic cell transplantation

Identifiers

PMID29534294
PMCPMC6146968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.