ArticleEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2018
Evolution of secondary mitral regurgitation.
Article in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning for echocardiographic assessment and risk stratification of aortic, mitral, and tricuspid regurgitation: the DELINEATE-regurgitation study.European heart journal · 2025Article
- Diagnosis and Diagnostic Challenges of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation in the Era of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair of the Mitral Valve.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Effects of a Cloud-Based Synchronous Telehealth Program on Valvular Regurgitation Regression: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Comparison of Outcomes of Edge-to-Edge Mitral Valve Repair Versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair for Functional Mitral Regurgitation.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Perspectives on Secondary Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure.Current heart failure reports · 2023Review
- Mitral regurgitation in the critically ill: the devil is in the detail.Annals of intensive care · 2023Review
- Metabolomics implicate eicosanoids in severe functional mitral regurgitation.ESC heart failure · 2023Article
- Association Between Sacubitril/Valsartan Initiation and Mitral Regurgitation Severity in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: The PROVE-HF Study.Circulation · 2022Article
- Development and validation of an echocardiographic algorithm to predict long-term mitral and tricuspid regurgitation progression.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2022Article
- Clinical impact of changes in mitral regurgitation severity after medical therapy optimization in heart failure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2022Article
- Burden, treatment use, and outcome of secondary mitral regurgitation across the spectrum of heart failure: observational cohort study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Observational
- Secondary mitral regurgitation-Insights from microRNA assessment.European journal of clinical investigation · 2021Article
- An Integrated Imaging and Circulating Biomarker Approach for Secondary Tricuspid Regurgitation.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- Secondary valve regurgitation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction, and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.European heart journal · 2020Review
- Phenotyping progression of secondary mitral regurgitation in chronic systolic heart failure.European journal of clinical investigation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Aims: Secondary mitral regurgitation (MR) drives adverse remodelling towards late heart failure stages. Little is known about the evolution of MR under guideline-directed therapy (GDT) and its relation to cardiac remodelling and outcome. We therefore aimed to assess incidence, impact, and predictors of progressive secondary MR in patients under GDT. Methods and results: We prospectively enrolled 249 patients with chronic heart failure and reduced ejection fraction receiving GDT in this long-term observational study. Of patients with non-severe MR at baseline 81% remained stable whereas 19% had progressive MR. Those patients were more symptomatic (P < 0.001), had higher neurohumoral activation (encompassing various neurohumoral pathways in heart failure, all P < 0.05), larger left atrial size (P = 0.004) and more tricuspid regurgitation (TR, P = 0.02). During a median follow-up of 61 months (IQR 50-72), 61 patients died. Progression of MR conveyed an increased risk of mortality-univariately (HR 2.33; 95% CI 1.34-4.08; P = 0.003), that persisted after multivariate adjustment using a bootstrap-selected confounder model (adjusted HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.40-4.39; P = 0.002). In contrast, regression of MR was not associated with a beneficiary effect on outcome (crude HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.30-2.30; P = 0.73). Conclusions: Every fifth patient with chronic heart failure suffers from MR progression. This entity is associated with a more than two-fold increased risk of death even after careful multivariable adjustment. Symptomatic status, left atrial size, TR, and neurohumoral pathways help to identify patients at risk for progressive secondary MR in an early disease process and open the possibility for closer follow-up and timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.