Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29534075›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Association between TERT rs2853669 polymorphism and cancer risk: A meta-analysis of 9,157 cases and 11,073 controls.

Zhengsheng Liu, Tao Wang, Zhun Wu, Kaiyan Zhang, Wei Li, Jianbin Yang, Chenxi Chen, Lei Chen, Jinchun Xing

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Association of Intergenic and IntragenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Can TERT rs2853669 polymorphysm indicate fibrosis in sarcoidosis?Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Spotlight onGenes · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Zhengsheng LiuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9960-129X
Tao WangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Zhun WuDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Kaiyan ZhangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Wei LiDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Jianbin YangDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Chenxi ChenDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.
Lei ChenZhuxi People Hospital, Hubei, China.
Jinchun XingDepartment of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9704-889X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt has been reported that the functional telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) rs2853669 polymorphism might contribute to different types of human cancer. However, the association of this mutation with cancer remains controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to characterize this relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS/MAIN

resultsA systematic search of studies on the association of TERT rs2853669 polymorphism with all types of cancer was conducted in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library. The summary odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to pool the effect size in a fixed-effects model or a random-effects model where appropriate. A total of 13 articles and 15 case-control studies, including 9,157 cases and 11,073 controls, were included in this meta-analysis. Overall, the pooled results indicated that the rs2853669 polymorphism was significantly associated with increased cancer risk in a homozygote comparison model (CT vs. TT: OR = 1.085, 95% CI: 1.015-1.159, P = 0.016). In the stratified analyses, a significant increased cancer risk was observed in Asian, but not Caucasian patients. A subgroup analysis by cancer type also revealed a significant increase in the risk of lung cancer, but not breast cancer.

conclusionsThe results of this meta-analysis suggest that the TERT rs2853669 polymorphism is associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer, particularly lung cancer, in Asian populations.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseasePolymorphism, Single NucleotideHumansNeoplasmsTelomeraseTelomeraseTERT protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29534075
PMCPMC5849304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.