Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29534063›Full record

Trial reportPLoS medicine2018

A clinical decision support tool for improving adherence to guidelines on anticoagulant therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation at risk of stroke: A cluster-randomized trial in a Swedish primary care setting (the CDS-AF study).

Lars O Karlsson, Staffan Nilsson, Magnus Bång, Lennart Nilsson, Emmanouil Charitakis, Magnus Janzon

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PLoS medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02635685 (Clinical Decision Support for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation - a Cluster Randomized Trial in the Primary Care Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 59 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02635685 naunknown statusnot on this map

Clinical Decision Support for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation - a Cluster Randomized Trial in the Primary Care Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, LinkoepingRan2016 to 2025Enrolled442,105ConditionsCardiovascular Disease, Atrial Fibrillation, StrokeArmsClinical Decision Support tool
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lars O KarlssonDepartment of Cardiology, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4852-3065
Staffan NilssonPrimary Health Care Center in Vikbolandet, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Vikbolandet, Sweden.
Magnus BångDepartment of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3606-8579
Lennart NilssonDepartment of Cardiology, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Emmanouil CharitakisDepartment of Cardiology, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Magnus JanzonDepartment of Cardiology, and Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9375-5087
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with substantial morbidity, in particular stroke. Despite good evidence for the reduction of stroke risk with anticoagulant therapy, there remains significant undertreatment. The main aim of the current study was to investigate whether a clinical decision support tool (CDS) for stroke prevention integrated in the electronic health record could improve adherence to guidelines for stroke prevention in patients with AF. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a cluster-randomized trial where all 43 primary care clinics in the county of Östergötland, Sweden (population 444,347), were randomized to be part of the CDS intervention or to serve as controls. The CDS produced an alert for physicians responsible for patients with AF and at increased risk for thromboembolism (according to the CHA2DS2-VASc algorithm) without anticoagulant therapy. The primary endpoint was adherence to guidelines after 1 year. After randomization, there were 22 and 21 primary care clinics in the CDS and control groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in baseline adherence to guidelines regarding anticoagulant therapy between the 2 groups (CDS group 70.3% [5,186/7,370; 95% CI 62.9%-77.7%], control group 70.0% [4,187/6,009; 95% CI 60.4%-79.6%], p = 0.83). After 12 months, analysis with linear regression with adjustment for primary care clinic size and adherence to guidelines at baseline revealed a significant increase in guideline adherence in the CDS (73.0%, 95% CI 64.6%-81.4%) versus the control group (71.2%, 95% CI 60.8%-81.6%, p = 0.013, with a treatment effect estimate of 0.016 [95% CI 0.003-0.028]; number of patients with AF included in the final analysis 8,292 and 6,508 in the CDS and control group, respectively). Over the study period, there was no difference in the incidence of stroke, transient ischemic attack, or systemic thromboembolism in the CDS group versus the control group (49 [95% CI 43-55] per 1,000 patients with AF in the CDS group compared to 47 [95% CI 39-55] per 1,000 patients with AF in the control group, p = 0.64). Regarding safety, the CDS group had a lower incidence of significant bleeding, with events in 12 (95% CI 9-15) per 1,000 patients with AF compared to 16 (95% CI 12-20) per 1,000 patients with AF in the control group (p = 0.04). Limitations of the study design include that the analysis was carried out in a catchment area with a high baseline adherence rate, and issues regarding reproducibility to other regions.

conclusionsThe present study demonstrates that a CDS can increase guideline adherence for anticoagulant therapy in patients with AF. Even though the observed difference was small, this is the first randomized study to our knowledge indicating beneficial effects with a CDS in patients with AF.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02635685.

Indexed as

AnticoagulantsAtrial FibrillationDecision Support Systems, ClinicalAgedElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareQuality ImprovementRisk AdjustmentStrokeSwedenAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID29534063
PMCPMC5849292
OpenAlexW2794083991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.