Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29533995›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiovascular development and disease2018

Using cAMP Sensors to Study Cardiac Nanodomains.

Katharina Schleicher, Manuela Zaccolo

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiovascular development and disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Signalling of Adrenoceptors: Canonical Pathways and New Paradigms.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Imaging cAMP nanodomains in the heart.Biochemical Society transactions · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Modes of Calcium Regulation in Ischemic Neuron.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katharina SchleicherDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Sherrington Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. katharina.schleicher@dpag.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8819-7287
Manuela ZaccoloDepartment of Physiology, Anatomy and Genetics, University of Oxford, Sherrington Building, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PT, UK. manuela.zaccolo@dpag.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/10/75/28537British Heart Foundation RG/17/6/32944
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3',5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) signalling plays a major role in the cardiac myocyte response to extracellular stimulation by hormones and neurotransmitters. In recent years, evidence has accumulated demonstrating that the cAMP response to different extracellular agonists is not uniform: depending on the stimulus, cAMP signals of different amplitudes and kinetics are generated in different subcellular compartments, eliciting defined physiological effects. In this review, we focus on how real-time imaging using fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based reporters has provided mechanistic insight into the compartmentalisation of the cAMP signalling pathway and allowed for the precise definition of the regulation and function of subcellular cAMP nanodomains.

Indexed as

3′,5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphateA kinase anchoring proteinscardiac biologycompartmentalisationfluorescence resonance energy transferphosphodiesterasesprotein kinase Areal-time imagingsignalling

Identifiers

PMID29533995
PMCPMC5872365
OpenAlexW2790773368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.