Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29533738›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism2018

Intragastric nutrient infusion reduces motivation for food in male and female rats.

Calyn B Maske, Gregory C Loney, Nicole Lilly, Sarah J Terrill, Diana L Williams

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Calyn B MaskeDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University , Tallahassee, Florida.ORCID 0000-0001-7605-4249
Gregory C LoneyDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University , Tallahassee, Florida.
Nicole LillyDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University , Tallahassee, Florida.
Sarah J TerrillDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University , Tallahassee, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-5473-2851
Diana L WilliamsDepartment of Psychology and Program in Neuroscience, Florida State University , Tallahassee, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-3548-7440
Florida State University · US

Funding

Neuroendocrine Integration of Satiety and Food RewardR01DK095757 · NIDDK · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, DIANA L · 2013 to 2022
$3.3M
Lateral Septal GLP-1 pathwaysF31DK115102 · NIDDK · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI TERRILL, SARAH · 2017 to 2018
$66k
NIDDK NIH HHS F31 DK115102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idea that gut-derived satiation signals influence food reward has recently gained traction, but this hypothesis is largely based on studies focused on neural circuitry, not the peripherally released signals. Here, we directly tested the hypothesis that intragastric (IG) nutrient infusion can suppress motivation for food. In a series of experiments, IG sucrose infusion (15 kcal) significantly and reliably reduced operant responding for a sucrose reward on a progressive ratio (PR) schedule. Moreover, food deprivation for 24 h before the test session did not prevent the suppressive effect of nutrients. The suppressive effect of IG sucrose on fixed ratio 5 (FR5) operant responding was also assessed as a comparison. The effect of IG nutrients to reduce motivation was not limited to sucrose; IG Ensure infusion (9.3 kcal) also significantly reduced PR operant responding for sucrose pellets. To verify that these effects were not secondary to the osmotic challenge of concentrated nutrients, we tested IG infusion of noncaloric saline solutions equiosmolar to 40% sucrose or Ensure and found no effect. Finally, we focused on glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and cholecystokinin (CCK) as candidate mediators for the effect of IG nutrients. Pretreatment with exendin-9, a GLP-1 receptor antagonist, delivered intraperitoneally, significantly attenuated the ability of IG nutrients to suppress PR responding and breakpoint in males, but not in females, whereas pretreatment with devazepide, a CCK

Indexed as

MotivationAnimalsCholecystokininConditioning, OperantDevazepideEnteral NutritionEstrous CycleFemaleGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorIntubation, GastrointestinalMaleRatsRats, WistarReceptor, Cholecystokinin AReinforcement ScheduleCholecystokininDevazepideGlucagon-Like Peptide 1Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 ReceptorReceptor, Cholecystokinin ASucrosefood intakefood rewardoperant conditioningsatiation signals

Identifiers

PMID29533738
PMCPMC6087724
OpenAlexW2794344150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.