Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29533463›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of physiology2018

Parturition and the perinatal period: can mode of delivery impact on the future health of the neonate?

R M Tribe, P D Taylor, N M Kelly, D Rees, J Sandall, H P Kennedy

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Health outcomes following caesarean birth- An observational study of twins discordant for mode of delivery.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

R M TribeDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3675-9978
P D TaylorDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.
N M KellyDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.
D ReesDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.
J SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, St Thomas' Hospital Campus, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK.
H P KennedyYale School of Nursing, 400 West Campus Drive, West Haven, CT 06516, USA.
St Thomas' Hospital · GBYale University · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/13/38/30289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caesarean section and instrumental delivery rates are increasing in many parts of the world for a range of cultural and medical reasons, with limited consideration as to how 'mode of delivery' may impact on childhood and long-term health. However, babies born particularly by pre-labour caesarean section appear to have a subtly different physiology from those born by normal vaginal delivery, with both acute and chronic complications such as respiratory and cardio-metabolic morbidities being apparent. It has been hypothesized that inherent mechanisms within the process of labour and vaginal delivery, far from being a passive mechanical process by which the fetus and placenta are expelled from the birth canal, may trigger certain protective developmental processes permissive for normal immunological and physiological development of the fetus postnatally. Traditionally the primary candidate mechanism has been the hormonal surges or stress response associated with labour and vaginal delivery, but there is increasing awareness that transfer of the maternal microbiome to the infant during parturition. Transgenerational transmission of disease traits through epigenetics are also likely to be important. Interventions such as probiotics, neonatal gut seeding and different approaches to clinical care have potential to influence parturition physiology and improve outcomes for infants.

Indexed as

Infant HealthLabor, ObstetricParturitionAnimalsFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancycaesarean sectionepigeneticshealthimmunityinfantlifecoursemicrobiomepregnancystress hormonesvaginal delivery

Identifiers

PMID29533463
PMCPMC6265543
OpenAlexW2793234966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.