Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29533367›Full record

ReviewMenopause (New York, N.Y.)2018

Tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC): a review.

James H Pickar, Matthieu Boucher, Diana Morgenstern

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Menopause (New York, N.Y.), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Treating menopause - MHT and beyond.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Dual-mechanism estrogen receptor inhibitors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James H PickarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Matthieu BoucherPfizer Canada Inc, Kirkland, QC, Canada.
Diana MorgensternPfizer Inc, Collegeville, PA.
Columbia University Irving Medical Center · USPfizer (Canada) · CAPfizer (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis review describes historical development of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and their combination with estrogens, termed a tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC), and considers the potential for future TSEC development.

methodsThis narrative review is based on literature identified on PubMed and the TSEC research and development experience of the authors.

resultsSERMs have estrogenic and antiestrogenic effects in various tissues; however, no single agent has achieved an optimal balance of agonist and antagonist effects for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. Clinically, a number of SERMs protect against osteoporosis and breast cancer but can exacerbate vasomotor symptoms. Estrogens alleviate menopausal hot flushes and genitourinary symptoms as well as reduce bone loss, but the addition of a progestogen to menopausal hormone therapy to protect against endometrial cancer increases vaginal bleeding risk, breast tenderness, and potentially breast cancer. The search for an effective menopausal therapy with better tolerability led to the investigation of TSECs. Clinical development of a TSEC consisting of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene increased understanding of the importance of a careful consideration of the combination's components and their respective doses to balance safety and efficacy. Bazedoxifene is an estrogen receptor agonist in bone but an antagonist/degrader in the endometrium, which has contributed to its success as a TSEC component. Other oral TSEC combinations studied thus far have not demonstrated similar endometrial safety.

conclusionsChoice of SERM, selection of doses, and clinical trial data evaluating safety and efficacy are key to ensuring safety and adequate therapeutic effect of TSECs for addressing menopausal symptoms.

Indexed as

Bone DensityBreast NeoplasmsDrug SynergismDrug Therapy, CombinationEndometriumEstrogensEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)FemaleHormone Replacement TherapyHumansIndolesMenopauseOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsbazedoxifeneEstrogensEstrogens, Conjugated (USP)IndolesSelective Estrogen Receptor Modulators

Identifiers

PMID29533367
PMCPMC6110370
OpenAlexW2790097493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.