ArticleHealth care management review
Contextual factors that influence quality improvement implementation in primary care: The role of organizations, teams, and individuals.
Article in Health care management review. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Teamwork Climate on Hospital Employees' Job Satisfaction and Perceived Healthcare Quality.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Method to engage invested partners to co-create feasible and sustainable approaches to design and implement cancer prevention and control tools.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Reframing the Kirkpatrick model for evaluating humanistic care training in nursing: a context-sensitive integrative perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Understanding the development and implementation of national quality of care and patient safety strategic documents: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Champions as catalysts for change: a realist evaluation of their impact in primary care.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Integrating Quality Improvement: A Qualitative Study of Leadership Approaches in Healthcare Services in Norwegian Municipalities.Health services insights · 2025Article
- How Professional and Market Logics and the Conflict between Institutional Demands Affect Hospital Accreditation Compliance: A Multiple-Case Study in Brazil.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- "If we work as a team, there are success stories." Unpacking team members' perceptions and experiences of what impacts team performance in a maternal and neonatal quality improvement programme in South Africa, before, and during COVID-19.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Organizational attributes that contribute to the learning & improvement capabilities of healthcare organizations: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Snakes and ladders: A qualitative study understanding the active ingredients of social interaction around the use of audit and feedback.Translational behavioral medicine · 2023Article
- What GPs do to meet accreditation standards - implementation activities and perceived improvements attributed to general practice accreditation.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- The perception of health care quality by primary health care managers in Ukraine.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Exploring the sustainability of perinatal audit in four district hospitals in the Western Cape, South Africa: a multiple case study approach.BMJ global health · 2022Article
- Examining the Unconscious Racial Biases and Attitudes of Physicians, Nurses, and the Public: Implications for Future Health Care Education and Practice.Health equity · 2022Article
- Managing Organizational Constraints in Innovation Teams: A Qualitative Study Across Four Health Systems.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2021Article
- A Quality Improvement Intervention to Inform Scale-Up of Integrated HIV-TB Services: Lessons Learned From KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Global health, science and practice · 2021Article
- Unpacking the intention to action gap: a qualitative study understanding how physicians engage with audit and feedback.Implementation science : IS · 2021Article
- Exploring implementation processes in general practice in a feedback intervention aiming to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing: a qualitative study among general practitioners.Implementation science communications · 2021Article
- Evidence-Based Policymaking: What Human Service Agencies Can Learn from Implementation Science and Integrated Data Systems.Global implementation research and applications · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRecent emphasis on value-based health care has highlighted the importance of quality improvement (QI) in primary care settings. QI efforts, which require providers and staff to work in cross-functional teams, may be implemented with varying levels of success, with implementation being affected by factors at the organizational, teamwork, and individual levels. PURPOSE: The purpose of our study was to (a) identify contextual factors (organizational, teamwork, and individual) that affect implementation effectiveness of QI interventions in primary care settings and (b) compare perspectives about these factors across roles (health care administrators, physician and nonphysician clinicians, and administrative staff). METHODS/APPROACH: We conducted semistructured interviews with 24 health care administrators, physician and nonphysician primary care providers, and administrative staff representing 10 primary care practices affiliated with one integrated delivery system.
resultsParticipants across all roles identified similar organizational- and team-level factors that influence QI implementation including organizational capacity to take on new initiatives (e.g., time availability of physicians), technical capability for QI (e.g., data analysis skills), and team climate (e.g., how well staff work together). There was greater variation in terms of individual-level factors, particularly perceived meaning and purpose of QI. Perceptions about value of QI ranged from positive impacts on patient care and practice competitiveness to decreased efficiency and distractions from patient care, but differences did not appear attributable to role.
conclusionsSuccessful QI implementation requires effective collaboration within cross-functional teams. Additional research is needed to assess how best to employ implementation strategies that promote cross-understanding of QI among team members and, ultimately, effective implementation of QI programs. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Health care managers in primary care settings should strive to create a strong teamwork climate, reinforced by opportunities for staff in various roles to discuss QI as a collective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.