Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29533245›Full record

ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2018

Intraocular Pressure Increases After Intraarticular Knee Injection With Triamcinolone but Not Hyaluronic Acid.

Kevin Taliaferro, Alexander Crawford, Justin Jabara, Jonathan Lynch, Edward Jung, Raimonds Zvirbulis, Trevor Banka

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05806021 (The Efficacy of Intra-articular Triamcinolone Acetonide 5mg vs. 10 mg vs. 40 mg in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05806021 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of Intra-articular Triamcinolone Acetonide 5mg vs. 10 mg vs. 40 mg in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: a Non-inferiority Randomized Controlled Double-blind Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled327ConditionsPrimary GonarthrosisArmsTriamcinolone Acetonide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy and safety of serial intralesional corticosteroids for subglottic stenosis: systematic review & meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Kevin TaliaferroK. Taliaferro, J. Lynch, E. Jung, R. Zvirbulis, T. Banka, Department of Orthopaedics, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA A. Crawford, J. Jabara, Wayne State School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Alexander Crawford
Justin Jabara
Jonathan Lynch
Edward Jung
Raimonds Zvirbulis
Trevor Banka
Defense Threat Reduction Agency · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraarticular steroid injections are a common first-line therapy for severe osteoarthritis, which affects an estimated 27 million people in the United States. Although topical, oral, intranasal, and inhalational steroids are known to increase intraocular pressure in some patients, the effect of intraarticular steroid injections on intraocular pressure has not been investigated, to the best of our knowledge. If elevated intraocular pressure is sustained for long periods of time or is of sufficient magnitude acutely, permanent loss of the visual field can occur. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: How does intraocular pressure change 1 week after an intraarticular knee injection either with triamcinolone acetonide or hyaluronic acid?

methodsA nonrandomized, nonblinded prospective cohort study was conducted at an outpatient, ambulatory orthopaedic clinic. This study compared intraocular pressure elevation before and 1 week after intraarticular knee injection of triamcinolone acetonide versus hyaluronic acid for management of primary osteoarthritis of the knee. Patients self-selected to be injected in their knee with either triamcinolone acetonide or hyaluronic acid before being informed of the study. The primary endpoint was intraocular pressure elevation of ≥ 7 mm Hg 1 week after injection. This cutoff is determined as the minimum significant pressure change in the ophthalmology literature recognized as an intermediate responder to steroids. Intraocular pressure was measured using a handheld Tono-Pen® applanation device. This device is frequently used in intraocular pressure measurement in clinical and research settings; 10 sequential measurements are obtained and averaged with a confidence interval. Only measurements with a 95% confidence interval were used. Over a 6-month period, a total of 96 patients were approached to enroll in the study. Sixty-two patients out of 96 approached (65%) agreed. Thirty-one (50%) were injected with triamcinolone and 31 (50%) were injected with hyaluronic acid. Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee who were suitable candidates for either a steroid injection or hyaluronic acid injection were included in the study. Exclusion criteria included previous glaucoma surgery, previous corneal injury precluding use of a Tono-Pen, current acute or chronic steroid use, and diagnosis of glaucoma other than primary open-angle. Patients with elevated intraocular pressure at the 1-week timepoint were invited to return at 1 month for repeat measurement; however, only five of nine (55.6%) were able to do so. The mean age of the total population was 64.1 ± 11.65 years. There were 46 (74%) women and 16 men. Patient in the hyaluronic acid injection group were younger than the triamcinolone group, 59.5 ± 11.7 versus 68.7 ± 9.7 years of age (p < 0.003).

resultsThe mean intraocular pressure increased by 2.79 mm Hg 1 week after treatment with triamcinolone, but it did not change among those patients treated with hyaluronic acid (2.79 ± 9.9 mm Hg versus -0.14 ± 2.96 mm Hg; mean difference 2.93 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -0.71 to 6.57 mm Hg; p = 0.12). More patients who received triamcinolone injections developed an increase in intraocular pressure > 7 mm than did those who received hyaluronic acid (29% [nine of 29] versus 0% [zero of 31]; p = 0.002). Of the nine patients who developed elevated intraocular pressure after a triamcinolone injection, five returned for reevaluation 1 month later, and four of them had pressures that remained elevated > 7 mm Hg from baseline.

conclusionsThere appears to be an associated intraocular pressure elevation found in patients who have undergone a triamcinolone injection of the knee. Further larger scale randomized investigations are warranted to determine the longevity of this pressure elevation as well as long-term clinical implications, including optic nerve damage and visual field loss. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansHyaluronic AcidInjections, Intra-ArticularIntraocular PressureMaleMiddle AgedOsteoarthritis, KneeProspective StudiesTriamcinolone AcetonideViscosupplementsGlucocorticoidsHyaluronic AcidTriamcinolone AcetonideViscosupplements

Identifiers

PMID29533245
PMCPMC6437574
OpenAlexW2809756579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.