Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29533022›Full record

ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2018

Endometrial cancer risk and survival by tumor MMR status.

Christina M Nagle, Tracy A O'Mara, Yen Tan, Daniel D Buchanan, Andreas Obermair, Penny Blomfield, Michael A Quinn, Penelope M Webb, Amanda B Spurdle, Australian Endometrial Cancer Study Group

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Deciphering survival disparities in endometrial cancer: a focus on mismatch repair pathway integrity (systematic review and meta-analysis).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Context-dependent environmental associations with endometrial cancer histotype and genotype.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Christina M NaglePopulation Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0334-1869
Tracy A O'MaraGenetics & Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5436-3232
Yen TanGenetics & Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1353-7707
Daniel D BuchananColorectal Oncogenomics Group, Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2225-6675
Andreas ObermairQueensland Centre of Gynaecological Research, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2199-1117
Penny BlomfieldDepartment of Gynaecology Oncology, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.
Michael A QuinnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2075-4822
Penelope M Webb *Population Health Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6171-3579
Amanda B Spurdle *Genetics & Computational Biology Department, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1337-7897
Australian Endometrial Cancer Study Group
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUThe University of Queensland · AURoyal Hobart Hospital · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe risk of developing endometrial cancer (EC) and/or survival following a diagnosis of EC might differ by tumor DNA mismatch repair (MMR) status. We assessed the association between tumor MMR status (classified as MMR-proficient, somatic MMR-deficient, germline MMR-deficient) and the risk of developing EC and survival following a diagnosis of EC.

methodsWe analyzed data from women who participated in the Australian National Endometrial Cancer Study (ANECS) conducted between 2005 and 2007. Risk analyses (698 cases/691 population controls) utilized sociodemographic and lifestyle information obtained from telephone interviews at recruitment. For survival analyses (728 cases), patients' clinical data was abstracted from medical records, and survival data were obtained via linkage with the Australian National Death Index. We used logistic regression analysis to evaluate the associations between tumor MMR status and EC risk, and proportional hazards models to perform survival analyses with adjustment of known prognostic factors.

resultsEstablished risk factors for EC did not differ significantly by tumor MMR status. In analyses including all EC subtypes, overall and EC-specific survival did not differ by tumor MMR status. Among women with the most common endometrioid subtype, EC-specific survival was worse for women with somatic MMR-deficient EC compared to women with MMR-proficient EC (hazard ratio [HR]=2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.19-4.01).

conclusionThe risk of EC is not associated with MMR status. Accurate separation of germline from somatic causes of MMR deficiency suggests that patients with endometrioid subtype somatic MMR-deficient tumors have poorer EC-specific survival than those with MMR-proficient tumors, after accounting for other prognostic factors.

Indexed as

DNA Mismatch RepairAgedContraceptives, Oral, HormonalEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, p53HumansMiddle AgedRiskSmokingContraceptives, Oral, HormonalDNA Mismatch RepairEndometrial NeoplasmsRiskSurvival

Identifiers

PMID29533022
PMCPMC5920223
OpenAlexW2793663217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.