Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29532996›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

National cancer database analysis of outcomes in pediatric glioblastoma.

Meng Liu, Jigisha P Thakkar, Catherine R Garcia, Therese A Dolecek, Lars M Wagner, Emily Van Meter Dressler, John L Villano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. The landscape of neuro-oncology in East Africa: a review of published records.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meng LiuDivision of Cancer Biostatistics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Jigisha P ThakkarDepartment of Neurology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Catherine R GarciaMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Therese A DolecekDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and Institute for Health Research and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Lars M WagnerMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Emily Van Meter DresslerDepartment of Biostatistical Sciences, School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, North Carolina.
John L VillanoMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.ORCID 0000-0001-5583-0093

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Clinical characteristics and patterns of care for rare brain tumor sub-typesR03CA156561 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI VILLANO, JOHN LEE · 2013 to 2014
$161k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NCI NIH HHS R03 CA156561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma in children is an aggressive disease with no defined standard therapy. We evaluated hospital-based demographic and survival patterns obtained through the National Cancer Database to better characterize children with glioblastoma. Our study identified 1173 patients from 0 to 19 years of age between 1998 and 2011. Comparisons were made among demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival variables. Fifty-four percent of patients were over 10 years of age. Approximately 80% of patients underwent either partial or complete resection. Adjuvant therapy was used variably, and its use increased with patient age. Forty-eight percent of patients received the combination of surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy, and 4% did not receive any treatment. As expected, patients ≤5 years of age had better 5-year survival than those ages 6-10 (P = 0.01) or 11-19 years (P = 0.0077). Other factors associated with poor survival included black race and central tumor location. Better outcomes were associated with treatment that included surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy compared to any other treatment combinations. Radiotherapy had no impact on survival in the 0 to 10-year-old age group, but was associated with improved survival for patients 11-19 years. We report an extensive demographic and survival analysis of pediatric glioblastoma. The observed differences likely reflect variances in tumor biology and likelihood of treatment receipt. Improved survival was associated with the use of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Radiation therapy was not associated with survival in patients younger than 10 years of age.

Indexed as

AdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyDatabases, FactualDisease ManagementFemaleGlioblastomaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOutcome Assessment, Health CarePopulation SurveillanceSurvival AnalysisUnited StatesOutcomespediatric glioblastomasurvivaltreatment

Identifiers

PMID29532996
PMCPMC5911617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.