Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29532945›Full record

ArticlePlant, cell & environment2019

UPLC-HRMS-based untargeted metabolic profiling reveals changes in chickpea (Cicer arietinum) metabolome following long-term drought stress.

Naeem Khan, Asghari Bano, Mohammad Atikur Rahman, Bala Rathinasabapathi, Md Ali Babar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed
30.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 255 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chickpea (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Naeem KhanDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0379-4622
Asghari BanoDepartment of Plant Sciences, Quaid-I-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Mohammad Atikur RahmanDepartment of Agronomy, IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Bala RathinasabapathiHorticulture Science Department, IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Md Ali BabarDepartment of Agronomy, IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
University of Florida · USQuaid-i-Azam University · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic improvement for drought tolerance in chickpea requires a solid understanding of biochemical processes involved with different physiological mechanisms. The objective of this study is to demonstrate genetic variations in altered metabolic levels in chickpea varieties (tolerant and sensitive) grown under contrasting water regimes through ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography/high-resolution mass spectrometry-based untargeted metabolomic profiling. Chickpea plants were exposed to drought stress at the 3-leaf stage for 25 days, and the leaves were harvested at 14 and 25 days after the imposition of drought stress. Stress produced significant reduction in chlorophyll content, F

Indexed as

MetabolomeChlorophyllChromatography, High Pressure LiquidCicerDehydrationMass SpectrometryMetabolomicsPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlant ShootsWaterChlorophyllWaterdroughtmetabolic pathwaymetabolitesUPLC-HRMS analysiswater stress

Identifiers

PMID29532945
PMCPMC7379973
OpenAlexW2794135796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.