Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29532802›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2017

In situ cultivation of previously uncultivable microorganisms using the ichip.

Brittany Berdy, Amy L Spoering, Losee L Ling, Slava S Epstein

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Illuminating Antarctic Microbial Dark Matter:Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Targeted isolation of HNature protocols · 2026
    Review
  10. Antimicrobial Resistance: The Answers.British journal of biomedical science · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Omics Technologies-Driven Research and Applications of Synthetic Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Tunable lysis of functionalized nanocultures for efficient microbial and nucleic acid recovery.Chemical engineering journal (Lausanne, Switzerland : 1996) · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brittany BerdyDepartment of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Amy L SpoeringNovoBiotic Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Losee L LingNovoBiotic Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Slava S EpsteinDepartment of Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

High throughput antibiotic discovery from the uncultivated microbial majority.R43AI085612 · NIAID · NOVOBIOTIC PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC · PI SPOERING, AMY LYNN · 2010 to 2011
$598k
NIAID NIH HHS R43 AI085612NIH HHS 1R01HG005816-01NIH HHS 1RC1DE020707-01NIH HHS R21 DE018026-01A1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most microbial species remain uncultivated, and modifying artificial nutrient media brings only an incremental increase in cultivability. We reasoned that an alternative way to cultivate species with unknown requirements is to use naturally occurring combinations of growth factors. To achieve this, we moved cultivation into the microbes' natural habitat by placing cells taken from varying environmental samples into diffusion chambers, which are then returned to nature for incubation. By miniaturizing the chambers and placing only one to several cells into each chamber, we can grow and isolate microorganisms in axenic culture in one step. We call this cultivation platform the 'isolation chip', or 'ichip'. This platform has been shown to increase microbial recovery from 5- to 300-fold, depending on the study. Furthermore, it provides access to a unique set of microbes that are inaccessible by standard cultivation. Here we provide a simple protocol for building and applying ichips for environmental cultivation of soil bacteria as an example; the protocol consists of (i) preparing the ichip; (ii) collecting an environmental sample; (iii) serially diluting cells and loading them into the ichip; (iv) returning the ichip to the environment for incubation; (v) retrieving the ichip and harvesting grown material; and (vi) domestication of the ichip-derived colonies for growth in the laboratory. The ichip's full assembly and deployment is a relatively simple procedure that, with experience, takes ∼2-3 h. After in situ incubation, retrieval of the ichip and processing of its contents will take ∼1-4 h, depending on which specific procedures are used.

Indexed as

BacteriaBacteriological TechniquesCell Culture TechniquesEnvironmental MicrobiologyEquipment DesignHumansMicroarray AnalysisMouth

Identifiers

PMID29532802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.