Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29532697›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on therapeutic targets2018

FOXP3+ Treg as a therapeutic target for promoting anti-tumor immunity.

Theresa L Whiteside

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on therapeutic targets, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 108 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
108citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

108 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 211 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The prognostic values of FOXP3Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. PD-L1Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Tumor-promoting effect and tumor immunity of SRSFs.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

48 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Theresa L Whitesidea Departments of Pathology, Immunology and Otolaryngology , University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Restoring anti-tumor immunity in the microenvironment of head and neck cancerR01CA168628 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WHITESIDE, THERESA L. · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
(PQ11) Reversing exosome-mediated immune suppression - a novel strategy for cancer therapyR21CA205644 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BOYIADZIS, MICHAEL, WHITESIDE, THERESA L. · 2016 to 2017
$370k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168628NCI NIH HHS R21 CA205644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRegulatory T cells (Treg) characterized by expression of FOXP3 and strong immunosuppressive activity play a key role in regulating homeostasis in health and disease. Areas covered: Human Treg are highly diverse phenotypically and functionally. In the tumor microenvironment (TME), Treg are reprogrammed by the tumor, acquiring an activated phenotype and enhanced suppressor functions. No unique phenotypic markers for Treg accumulating in human tumors exist. Treg are heterogeneous and use numerous mechanisms to mediate suppression, which either silences anti-tumor immune surveillance or prevents tissue damage by activated T cells. Treg plasticity in the TME endows them with dual functionality. Treg frequency in tumors associates either with poor or improved survival. Treg responses to immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) differ from the restorative effects ICIs induce in other immune cells. Therapies used to silence Treg, including ICIs, are only partly successful. Treg persistence and resistance to depletion are critical for maintaining homeostasis. Expert opinion: Treg emerge as a heterogeneous subset of immunosuppressive T cells, which usually, but not always, favor tumor progression. Treg are also engaged in non-immune activities that benefit the host. Therapeutic silencing of Treg in cancer requires a deeper understanding of Treg activities in human health and disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ProgressionForkhead Transcription FactorsHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsPhenotypeT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryTumor MicroenvironmentForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXP3 protein, humancancerRegulatory T cells (Treg)Treg and checkpoint inhibitionTreg phenotypeTreg suppressor functionstumor microenvironment (TME)

Identifiers

PMID29532697
PMCPMC6126897
OpenAlexW2790751214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.