Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29532483›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2018

Low-dose cone-beam CT via raw counts domain low-signal correction schemes: Performance assessment and task-based parameter optimization (Part I: Assessment of spatial resolution and noise performance).

John W Hayes, Daniel Gomez-Cardona, Ran Zhang, Ke Li, Juan Pablo Cruz-Bastida, Guang-Hong Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

John W HayesDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Daniel Gomez-CardonaDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Ran ZhangDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Ke LiDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Juan Pablo Cruz-BastidaDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Guang-Hong ChenDepartment of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health, 1111 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.

Funding

Ultra-Low Radiation Dose Body CT ImagingR01CA169331 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHEN, GUANG-HONG, PICKHARDT, PERRY · 2012 to 2016
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLow-signal correction (LSC) in the raw counts domain has been shown to effectively reduce noise streaks in CT because the data inconsistency associated with photon-starved regions may be mitigated prior to the log transformation step. However, a systematic study of the performance of these raw data correction methods is still missing in literature. The purpose of this work was to provide such a systematic study for two well-known low-signal correction schemes using either the adaptive trimmed mean (ATM) filter or the anisotropic diffusion (AD) filter in the raw counts domain.

methodsImage data were acquired experimentally using an anthropomorphic chest phantom and a benchtop cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging system. Phantom scans were repeated 50 times at a reduced dose level of 0.5 mGy and a reference level of 1.9 mGy. The measured raw counts at 0.5 mGy underwent LSC using the ATM and AD filters. Two relevant parameters were identified for each filter and approximately one hundred operating points in each parameter space were analyzed. Following LSC and log transformation, FDK reconstruction was performed for each case. Noise and spatial resolution properties were assessed across the parameter spaces that define each LSC filter; the results were summarized through 2D contour maps to better understand the trade-offs between these competing image quality features. 2D noise power spectrum (NPS) and modulation transfer function (MTF) were measured locally at two spatial locations in the field-of-view (FOV): a posterior region contaminated by noise streaks and an anterior region away from noise streaks. An isotropy score metric was introduced to characterize the directional dependence of the NPS and MTF (viz., ϵ

results(a) Both the ATM and AD LSC methods were successful in reducing noise streaks, but their noise and spatial resolution properties were found to be highly anisotropic and shift-variant. (b) NPS isotropy scores in the posterior region were generally improved from ϵ

conclusionsBoth AD and ATM LSC schemes enable low-dose CBCT imaging. However, it was found that noise magnitude and overall spatial resolution vary considerably across the parameter space for each filter, and more importantly these image quality features are highly anisotropic and shift-variant.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyRadiation DosageSignal-To-Noise RatioImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of Resultsadaptive trimmed mean filteranisotropic diffusionCTlow-signal correctionnoise streaksspatial resolution

Identifiers

PMID29532483
PMCPMC8693893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.