ArticleEndocrine2018
Complete evaluation of pituitary tumours in a single tertiary care institution.
Article in Endocrine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term behaviour of non-functioning pituitary microadenomas: experience from a tertiary care centre in Romania.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Clinical Biology of the Pituitary Adenoma.Endocrine reviews · 2022Review
- Clinical evaluation of pituitary insufficiency in adult populationTurkish journal of medical sciences · 2020Article
- Transnasal Transsphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Tumors: An ENT Perspective.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2020Article
- SDF-1α/MicroRNA-134 Axis Regulates Nonfunctioning Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumor GrowthFrontiers in endocrinology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWe retrospectively evaluated all patients with pituitary tumours treated in our department from 1/1/1997 to 01/11/2014. PATIENTS AND
methodsTwo hundred and fifteen patients (124 females, 91 males, mean age 50.9 years) were treated because of pituitary tumours. All patients underwent basal hormonal analysis and when required dynamic testing in order to check for hormonal activity. Pituitary masses were divided into groups concerning their hormonal status and were further classified according to gender, age at diagnosis, tumour size, and the development of postoperative pituitary insufficiency when neurosurgical intervention was conducted.
resultsOne hundred and twenty-one patients had hormonally inactive tumours (non-functional adenomas; 56.3%), 57 prolactinomas (26.5%), 17 growth hormone secreting adenomas (7.9%), 16 Cushing's disease (7.4%), and 4 craniopharyngiomas (1.9%). Tumours with maximum size <1 cm (microadenomas) were detected in 62 patients (28.8%) and ≥1 cm (macroadenomas) in 153 (71.2%) of all cases (rate 1:2.5). Ninty eight patients (45.6%) had surgery (87 transsphenoidal and 11 transcranial), of this group 34 with hormonally active tumours (37.8% of the 90 patients of this subcohort). Indications for surgery were an increased risk or manifestation of chiasma syndrome and clinical symptoms due to hormonal hypersecretion. Complete [32 cases (32.6%)] or partial [33 cases (33.7%)] postoperative insufficiency in minimum one pituitary axis was present in 65/98 (66.3%) of the operated patients.
conclusionsPituitary adenoma prevalence is rising due to widely available imaging procedures. The majority of the tumours in our cohort were macroadenomas and hormonally inactive. Tumour extirpation via the transsphenoidal or transcranial route resulted in functional pituitary impairment of variable extent in 2/3 of the patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.