Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29532380›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Potential harmful elements in coal dust and human health risk assessment near the mining areas in Cherat, Pakistan.

Muhammad Ishtiaq, Noor Jehan, Said Akbar Khan, Said Muhammad, Umar Saddique, Bushra Iftikhar, Zahidullah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Chemical Composition and Toxicity of PMLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anti-Inflammatory and Anti-Remodelling Potential of Ethanol ExtractReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mining is bad for health: a voyage of discovery.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad IshtiaqDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Noor JehanDepartment of Environmental Sciences, University of Peshawar, Peshawar, 25120, Pakistan.
Said Akbar KhanDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Bahria University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Said MuhammadDepartment of Earth Sciences, COMSATS University, Abbottabad, 22060, Pakistan. saidmuhammad1@gmail.com.
Umar SaddiqueDepartment of Chemistry, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, 23200, Pakistan.
Bushra IftikharDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Khyber Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
ZahidullahDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate the potential harmful element (PHE) concentrations in coal dust and evaluate the human risk assessment and health effects near coal mining areas. For this purpose, dust samples were collected near various coal mines in Cherat, Pakistan, and analyzed for the PHE concentrations. Determined PHE concentrations were evaluated for the health risk assessment. Results revealed that ingestion was the major pathway as compared to others for PHE exposure. Individual chronic daily intake (CDI) of PHEs was higher than their respective permissible exposure limits set for oral exposure routes by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Chronic risk or health index (HI) values were observed < 1 for all PHEs and in the order of Pb > Cr > Cd > Ni > Cu > Co > Zn. Higher HI values of Pb, Cr, and Cd could attribute to various chronic health problems as observed during the medical examination survey of this study. Cancer risk (CR) values for this study were observed within the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) limits. However, if current practices continued, the PHEs will cross these limits in a near future. Therefore, this study strongly recommends the provision of safety measures, rules, and regulation to avoid health hazards in the future.

Indexed as

CoalCoal MiningDustHumansMineralsPakistanRisk AssessmentUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyCoalDustMineralsCancer riskChronic daily intakeChronic riskCoal dustCoal mines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.