Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29532215›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2018

Tobacco Control Policy Adoption Dynamics: A Case Study of Missouri Communities.

Kevin D Everett, Ginny Chadwick, Stanley R Cowan, Emily Kinkade

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Adoption of Tobacco 21: A Cross-Case Analysis of Ten US States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kevin D EverettFamily and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA. everettk@health.missouri.edu.
Ginny ChadwickFamily and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Stanley R CowanFamily and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
Emily KinkadeTruman State University, Kirksville, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco control policies reduce the health and economic burden caused by tobacco. With over half of the United States communities lacking adequate protective policies, an examination of policy adoption factors can provide insights to facilitate policy adoption. A case study approach examines the rate of adoption, prominent media frames, policy leaders' perceptions and coalition activities for smokefree and Tobacco 21 policies adopted in Missouri. Findings show compared to smokefree policy, Tobacco 21 requires a considerably shorter timeframe and fewer resources for adoption. Tobacco 21 coalitions target a small group of stakeholders compared to smokefree coalitions' emphasis on broad community engagement. Both policies are formally opposed, but elected officials perceive less political risk supporting Tobacco 21. As a new tobacco control policy tool, Tobacco 21 has relative advantage that should be considered by community health advocates.

Indexed as

Health PolicyHumansLeadershipMissouriOligopeptidesPublic HealthPublic PolicySmoke-Free PolicySmoking PreventionUnited StatesOligopeptidespyroglutamyl-arginyl-glutamyl-arginyl-tyrosinamideRelative advantageSmokefree policySocial constructionTobacco 21Tobacco control

Identifiers

PMID29532215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.