Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29532184›Full record

SynthesisProgress in orthodontics2018

The effect of pacifier sucking on orofacial structures: a systematic literature review.

Karin Michèle Schmid, Remo Kugler, Prasad Nalabothu, Carles Bosch, Carlalberta Verna

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Progress in orthodontics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03513003 (The Use of a Pacifier to Correct Malocclusions in Young Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03513003 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Use of a Pacifier to Correct Malocclusions in Young Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRan2020 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsMalocclusionArmsFunctional Pacifier, Stop habit
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prevalence of Orthodontic Malocclusions in Healthy Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karin Michèle SchmidDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Remo KuglerDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Prasad NalabothuDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Carles BoschDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Carlalberta VernaDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, Hebelstrasse 3, 4056, Basel, Switzerland. carlalberta.verna@unibas.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0272-6270

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-nutritive sucking habits may adversely affect the orofacial complex. This systematic literature review aimed to find scientific evidence on the effect of pacifier sucking on orofacial structures.

methodsA search on MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science databases was conducted to find all pertinent articles published from inception until February 2018, based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the risk of bias judgements in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I).

resultsAmong the 2288 articles found, 17 articles met the selection criteria: seven prospective cohort studies, nine cross-sectional studies, and one randomized clinical trial. Using ROBINS-I, 12 studies were evaluated to have a serious overall risk of bias and five, a moderate one. These studies claimed a strong association between a pacifier sucking habit and the presence of an anterior open bite and posterior crossbite. Functional/orthodontic pacifiers were shown to cause significantly less open bites than the conventional ones.

conclusionsHigh level of evidence of the effect of sucking habits on orofacial structures is missing. The available studies show severe or moderate risk of bias; hence, the findings in the literature need to be very carefully evaluated. There is moderate evidence that the use of pacifier is associated with anterior open bite and posterior crossbite, thus affecting the harmonious development of orofacial structures. Functional/orthodontic pacifiers reduce the prevalence of open bite when compared to the conventional ones, but evidence is needed concerning the effects on posterior crossbite. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to further analyze the effects of functional/orthodontic and conventional pacifiers on orofacial structures.

Indexed as

Maxillofacial DevelopmentSucking BehaviorHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMalocclusionOpen BitePacifiersMalocclusionNon-nutritive sucking habitsOpen biteOrofacial structuresOverjetPacifierPosterior crossbiteSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29532184
PMCPMC5847634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.