Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29532170›Full record

SynthesisGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2018

Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for large macular holes: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Chufeng Gu, Qinghua Qiu

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A retrospective, multicenter study on the management of macular holes without residual internal limiting membrane: the refractory macular hole (ReMaHo) study.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chufeng GuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, People's Republic of China.
Qinghua QiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 100 Haining Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai, 200080, People's Republic of China. qinghuaqiu@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8383-892X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this systematic review was to determine the anatomical outcome-macular hole (MH) closure rate-and functional outcome-visual acuity (VA) improvement rate-of the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap technique for large MH.

methodsWe searched for articles on large MH (> 400 μm) treated with inverted ILM flap technique in databases as of December 1, 2017. And single-arm meta-analysis was performed for the primary outcome of MH closure rate and the secondary outcome of VA improvement rate. In addition, we searched and pooled studies treating large MH with indocyanine green (ICG)-assisted ILM peeling as the reference. R software (version 2.15.2) was used for analysis.

resultsThis review includes eight studies that used inverted ILM flap technique to treat large MH (> 400 μm). Based on the single-arm meta-analysis performed in R 2.15.2, the pooled MH closure rate and VA improvement rate following inverted ILM flap technique were 95% (95% CI, 88 to 98%) and 75% (95% CI, 62 to 85%), respectively, in fixed-effect models. There was no substantial methodological heterogeneity. In addition, we selected four studies on large MH treated with ICG-assisted ILM peeling as the reference. The fixed-model pooled MH closure rate and VA improvement rate were 87% (95% CI, 79 to 92%) and 57% (95% CI, 46 to 68%), respectively.

conclusionsInverted ILM flap technique should be an effective and safe method for treating large MH, with high closure rates and good VA improvement. However, further studies in large randomized controlled trials on minimizing surgical complications and understanding the mechanism of this technique are necessary.

Indexed as

Surgical FlapsVisual AcuityBasement MembraneHumansRetinal PerforationsTomography, Optical CoherenceVitrectomyInternal limiting membrane peelingInverted internal limiting membrane flap techniqueLarge macular hole

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.