ArticleJAMA2018
Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More Credibility.
Article in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indirect feedback as a tool for identifying academic misconduct: a cross-sectional multicentral study among medical students.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Why Universities Should Make Misconduct Reports Public.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2025Article
- Publication integrity: what is it, why does it matter, how it is safeguarded and how could we do better?Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025Review
- Fraud: A Growing Threat to Academia's Credibility.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2024Article
- What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions?Science and engineering ethics · 2023Article
- Improving research integrity: a framework for responsible science communication.BMC research notes · 2022Article
- COVID-19: The urgent call for academic research in research ethics.Ethics, medicine, and public health · 2021Article
- A scoping review of the literature featuring research ethics and research integrity cases.BMC medical ethics · 2021Article
- Transatlantic editorial: Institutional investigations of ethically flawed reports in cardiothoracic surgery journals.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2020Article
- COVID-19 research: pandemicForensic sciences research · 2020Article
- Article
- Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium.Science and engineering ethics · 2019Article
- Overdue: a US advisory board for research integrity.Nature · 2019Article
- Quality of reports of investigations of research integrity by academic institutions.Research integrity and peer review · 2019Article
- Making the scientific literature fail-safe.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29532069What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.