Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531858›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2018

Preparation and evaluation of a

Irina Velikyan, Örjan Lindhe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Swine models for translational oncological research: an evolving landscape and regulatory considerations.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. In vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Irina VelikyanSection of Nuclear Medicine and PET, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala UniversityUppsala, Sweden.
Örjan LindheUppsala Imanet, GE HealthcareSE-75109, Uppsala, Sweden.
General Electric (Spain) · ESUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring general disease marker such as angiogenesis may contribute to the development of personalized medicine and improve therapy outcome. Readily availability of positron emitter based imaging agents providing quantification would expand clinical positron emission tomography (PET) applications. Generator produced

Indexed as

68Gaangiogenesisanimal PETcancerendometriosisfrozen section autoradiographyLewis lung carcinomaorgan distributionPETRGDwhole body autoradiography

Identifiers

PMID29531858
PMCPMC5840320
OpenAlexW2804887981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.