Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531844›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2017

Perceptions of the quality of generic medicines: implications for trust in public services within the local health system in Tumkur, India.

Praveen Kumar Aivalli, Maya Annie Elias, Manoj Kumar Pati, Srinath Bhanuprakash, Chikkagollahalli Munegowda, Zubin Cyrus Shroff, Prashanth N Srinivas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
15.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. A comprehensive quality control and cost comparison study of branded and generic angiotensin receptor blockers.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Praveen Kumar AivalliInstitute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Maya Annie EliasInstitute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Manoj Kumar PatiInstitute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Srinath BhanuprakashInstitute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Chikkagollahalli MunegowdaInstitute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Zubin Cyrus ShroffAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Prashanth N SrinivasInstitute of Public Health, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0968-0826
Institute of Public Health Bengaluru · INWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGeneric medicines are an important policy option to reduce out-of-pocket expenditure on medicines. However, negative perceptions of their quality affect utilisation and raise issues of confidence and trust in medicines and health services. The aim of the study was to test the quality of generic and branded medicines and explain negative perceptions towards generic medicines.

methodsThe study was part of a larger study on access to medicines. Information on various quality parameters was collected for branded medicines and branded and unbranded generic versions of the same medicines from government and private pharmacies in Karnataka in Southern India. To assess perceptions related to quality and drivers of preferred point of care (public vs private), focus group discussions were conducted with diabetes and hypertension patients, health workers and private pharmacists. The results of the quality tests were assessed and thematic analysis was conducted on the qualitative data to develop a conceptual framework to explain perceptions of medicine and care quality in the local health system.

resultsThe generic and branded variants of the medicines tested were of comparable quality. Contrary to the quality test results, patients' and health workers' perceptions of quality were largely in favour of branded medicines. Negative perceptions of medicine quality along with other drivers contribute towards choosing more expensive medicines in the private sector. Trust in the health system emerged as an underlying central theme that explained and drove choice of medicines and providers within the local health system.

conclusionNegative perceptions of generic medicines and preferential promotion of branded medicines over generics by pharmaceutical companies could influence prescriber behaviour and affect trust in healthcare provided in public services. To succeed, access to medicines programmes need to systematically invest in information on quality of medicines and develop strategies to build trust in healthcare offered in government health services.

Indexed as

diabeteshealth systemshypertensionpublic healthqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID29531844
PMCPMC5844374
OpenAlexW2783778183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.