Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531831›Full record

ArticleCell death discovery2018

Common medium versus advanced IVF medium for cryopreserved oocytes in heterologous cycles.

R Poverini, R Lisi, F Lisi, V Berlinghieri, W Bielli, P Carfagna, A Costantino, D Iacomino, G Nicodemo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death discovery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. ISAR Consensus Guidelines on Add-Ons Treatment inJournal of human reproductive sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

R PoveriniIVF Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy.
R LisiIVF Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy.
F LisiIVF Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy.
V BerlinghieriIVF Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy.
W BielliIVF Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy.
P CarfagnaIVF Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy.
A CostantinoIVF Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy.
D IacominoIVF Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy.
G NicodemoIVF Unit, Casa di Cura Villa Mafalda, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulation factor plays different crucial roles during embryo implantation and subsequent development. Here we aimed to evaluate the effects of embryo cell culture medium, with the inclusion of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulation factor (GM-CSF), on embryo development and pregnancy rate. To this end, we took advantage of our retrospective observational study to correlate the outcomes from two different culture media. We included in this study 25 unselected patient from our IVF Center that underwent heterologous IVF cycle with crypreserved oocytes. We analyze the fertilization rate, pregnancy rate, and embryo quality at different day of transfer obtained from two different media composition. Our results show that the rate of fertilization and the pregnancy rate were increased using medium added with this particular type of cytokines (GM-CSF).

Identifiers

PMID29531831
PMCPMC5841294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.