Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531766›Full record

ArticleOpen heart

Six-minute walk distance after coronary artery bypass grafting compared with medical therapy in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Ralph A H Stewart, Dominika Szalewska, Amanda Stebbins, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, John G H Cleland, Andrzej Rynkiewicz, Mark H Drazner, Harvey D White, Daniel B Mark, Ambuj Roy and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open heart. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00023595 (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00023595 phase3completednot on this map

Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH)

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2002 to 2015Enrolled2,136ConditionsCardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Disease, Heart Failure, Congestive, Heart DiseasesArmsCABG surgery plus MED, Active Medication Alone, CABG plus MED and SVR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 9 countries.

Ralph A H StewartGreen Lane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland City Hospital and University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Dominika SzalewskaRehabilitation Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland.
Amanda StebbinsDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (HRA), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Hussein R Al-KhalidiDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (HRA), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
John G H ClelandNational Heart and Lung Institute, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Imperial College, London, UK.
Andrzej RynkiewiczDepartment of Cardiology and Cardiosurgery, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.
Mark H DraznerDepartment of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Harvey D WhiteGreen Lane Cardiovascular Service, Auckland City Hospital and University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Daniel B MarkDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (HRA), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Ambuj RoyDepartment of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Dragana KosevicDepartment of Cardiology, Dedinje Cardiovascular Institute, Belgrade, Serbia.
Miroslaw RajdaNova Scotia Health Authority, Queen Elizabeth II Health Science Centre, Halifax, Canada.
Marek JasinskiDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Chua Yeow LengDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Wiwun TungsubutraSiriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patrice Desvigne-NickensNational Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Eric J VelazquezDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics (HRA), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mark C PetrieDepartment of Cardiology, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Duke University · USUniversity of Auckland · NZAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INClinical Research Institute · USDuke University Hospital · USGdańsk Medical University · PLGolden Jubilee National Hospital · GBImperial College London · GBInstitute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina · RSMahidol University · THNational Heart Centre Singapore · SGNational Heart Lung and Blood Institute · USNova Scotia Health Authority · CAThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn · PLWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

STICH Trial-Coordinating CenterU01HL069015 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JONES, ROBERT H · 2002 to 2011
$27.3M
STICHESR01HL105853 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI AL-KHALIDI, HUSSEIN · 2011 to 2015
$10.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL105853NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL069015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction, coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) may decrease mortality, but it is not known whether CABG improves functional capacity. Objective: To determine whether CABG compared with medical therapy alone (MED) increases 6 min walk distance in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction and coronary artery disease amenable to revascularisation. Methods: The Surgical Treatment in Ischemic Heart disease trial randomised 1212 patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction to CABG or MED. A 6 min walk distance test was performed both at baseline and at least one follow-up assessment at 4, 12, 24 and/or 36 months in 409 patients randomised to CABG and 466 to MED. Change in 6 min walk distance between baseline and follow-up were compared by treatment allocation. Results: 6 min walk distance at baseline for CABG was mean 340±117 m and for MED 339±118 m. Change in walk distance from baseline was similar for CABG and MED groups at 4 months (mean +38 vs +28 m), 12 months (+47 vs +36 m), 24 months (+31 vs +34 m) and 36 months (-7 vs +7 m), P>0.10 for all. Change in walk distance between CABG and MED groups over all assessments was also similar after adjusting for covariates and imputation for missing values (+8 m, 95% CI -7 to 23 m, P=0.29). Results were consistent for subgroups defined by angina, New York Heart Association class ≥3, left ventricular ejection fraction, baseline walk distance and geographic region. Conclusion: In patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction CABG compared with MED alone is known to reduce mortality but is unlikely to result in a clinically significant improvement in functional capacity. Trial registration number: NCT00023595.

Indexed as

clinical trialcoronary artery bypass graftingexercise capacityischemic cardiomyopathysix-minute walk distance

Identifiers

PMID29531766
PMCPMC5845417
OpenAlexW2788558911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.