Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531672›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2018

Effects of vulture exclusion on carrion consumption by facultative scavengers.

Jacob E Hill, Travis L DeVault, James C Beasley, Olin E Rhodes, Jerrold L Belant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Farmland abandonment and season drive scavenging dynamics in livestock-rewilded landscapes.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Global decline of apex scavengers threatens human health.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jacob E HillCarnivore Ecology Laboratory Forest and Wildlife Research Center Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0632-3890
Travis L DeVaultAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center U.S. Department of Agriculture Sandusky OH USA.
James C BeasleySavannah River Ecology Laboratory University of Georgia Aiken SC USA.
Olin E RhodesSavannah River Ecology Laboratory University of Georgia Aiken SC USA.
Jerrold L BelantCarnivore Ecology Laboratory Forest and Wildlife Research Center Mississippi State University Mississippi State MS USA.
Mississippi State University · USUniversity of Georgia · USAnimal and Plant Health Inspection Service · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vultures provide an essential ecosystem service through removal of carrion, but globally, many populations are collapsing and several species are threatened with extinction. Widespread declines in vulture populations could increase the availability of carrion to other organisms, but the ways facultative scavengers might respond to this increase have not been thoroughly explored. We aimed to determine whether facultative scavengers increase carrion consumption in the absence of vulture competition and whether they are capable of functionally replacing vultures in the removal of carrion biomass from the landscape. We experimentally excluded 65 rabbit carcasses from vultures during daylight hours and placed an additional 65 carcasses that were accessible to vultures in forested habitat in South Carolina, USA during summer (June-August). We used motion-activated cameras to compare carrion use by facultative scavenging species between the experimental and control carcasses. Scavenging by facultative scavengers did not increase in the absence of competition with vultures. We found no difference in scavenger presence between control carcasses and those from which vultures were excluded. Eighty percent of carcasses from which vultures were excluded were not scavenged by vertebrates, compared to 5% of carcasses that were accessible to vultures. At the end of the 7-day trials, there was a 10.1-fold increase in the number of experimental carcasses that were not fully scavenged compared to controls. Facultative scavengers did not functionally replace vultures during summer in our study. This finding may have been influenced by the time of the year in which the study took place, the duration of the trials, and the spacing of carcass sites. Our results suggest that under the warm and humid conditions of our study, facultative scavengers would not compensate for loss of vultures. Carcasses would persist longer in the environment and consumption of carrion would likely shift from vertebrates to decomposers. Such changes could have substantial implications for disease transmission, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem functioning.

Indexed as

Cathartes auracompetitionscavenging

Identifiers

PMID29531672
PMCPMC5838040
OpenAlexW2791976685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.