Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531660›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in hematology2018

Safety and efficacy of nilotinib in routine clinical practice in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in chronic or accelerated phase with resistance or intolerance to imatinib: results from the NOVEL study.

Ching-Yuan Kuo, Po-Nan Wang, Wen-Li Hwang, Cheng-Hwai Tzeng, Li-Yaun Bai, Jih-Luh Tang, Ming-Chih Chang, Sheng-Fung Lin, Tsai-Yun Chen, Yeu-Chin Chen and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in hematology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of real-world versus clinical trial outcomes of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia.Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ching-Yuan KuoKaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
Po-Nan WangChang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linko, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Wen-Li HwangTaichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Cheng-Hwai TzengTaipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Li-Yaun BaiChina Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Jih-Luh TangNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Ming-Chih ChangMackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Sheng-Fung LinKaohsiung Medical University and Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Tsai-Yun ChenNational Cheng Kung University Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan.
Yeu-Chin ChenTri-Service General Hospital (TSGH), Taipei, Taiwan.
Tran-Der TanKoo Foundation Sun Yet-Sen Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chih-Yi HsiehNovartis (Taiwan) Co. Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan.
Chinjune LinNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, New Jersey, USA.
Clinton LaiNovartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte. Ltd., Singapore.
Darko MiljkovicNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Cheng-Shyong ChangChanghua Christian Hospital, No. 135, Nan-Xiao Street, Changhua, 500 Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1016-8125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNilotinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is approved for the treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in many countries, including Taiwan. Though a number of controlled clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of nilotinib, studies assessing the safety and efficacy of nilotinib in routine clinical practice are limited.

methodsThe current study was an open-label, single-arm study conducted across 12 centers in Taiwan in adult patients with CML in chronic or accelerated phase with confirmed Ph+ chromosome (or BCR-ABL) and resistant or intolerant to one or more previous TKIs. The primary objective was to collect the long-term safety data in patients treated with nilotinib 400 mg, twice daily for up to 2 years.

resultsThe study enrolled 85 patients with CML, including 76 in the chronic phase (CML-CP) and 9 in the accelerated phase (CML-AP). Overall, 1166 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 80 patients (94.1%), of which 70 AEs (6%) in 28 patients (32.9%) were serious and 336 AEs (28.8%) reported in 60 patients (70.6%) were drug-related. Common drug-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (21.2%), increased alanine aminotransferase (21.2%) and pruritus (17.7%). Of the 85 patients, 19 switched from imatinib due to intolerance - AEs were resolved in 16 of these 19 patients (84.2%). By 24 months, the cumulative rates of complete cytogenetic response (CCyR), major molecular response (MMR), MR4.0 (

conclusionThis is the first study that demonstrated that nilotinib is effective and well-tolerated in patients resistant or intolerant to imatinib in the real-world setting in Taiwan, reflecting effective management of CML by physicians under routine clinical practice in Taiwan.

Indexed as

chronic myeloid leukemiaclinical trialimatinib-resistantnilotinib

Identifiers

PMID29531660
PMCPMC5843102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.