Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531639›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics2018

Mutation detection using plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in a cohort of asymptomatic adults at increased risk for cancer.

Anja Kammesheidt, Theresa R Tonozzi, Stephen W Lim, Glenn D Braunstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Circulating Tumor DNA Assays in Clinical Cancer Research.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anja KammesheidtPathway GenomicsSan Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Theresa R TonozziPathway GenomicsSan Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Stephen W LimPathway GenomicsSan Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Glenn D BraunsteinPathway GenomicsSan Diego, CA 92121, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe primary purpose of this study was to clinically evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) with a nine gene, 96 mutation panel among subjects at increased risk for cancer with no previous cancer diagnosis. SUBJECTS AND

methodsDNA from 1059 asymptomatic subjects was analyzed for detection of low levels ctDNA using a blood plasma liquid biopsy assay. Subjects with detectable copies of ctDNA were asked to provide additional blood samples and relevant medical records throughout their one-year of participation. Subjects with a negative result were followed-up at one-year with a questionnaire.

resultsMutations were detected in 58 subjects and not detected in 1001 subjects. Among the subjects who tested positive for one or more mutations, four were diagnosed with cancer, two of which through study-triggered clinical follow-up. Two subjects who tested negative on the screen received an early cancer diagnosis over the course of the year. The sensitivity of the assay at a threshold of ≥2 copies in this population was 66.67% and specificity was 94.87%. While the negative predictive value was 99.8%, the positive predictive value was only 6.9% in this cohort. Analysis of buffy coat DNA from eight positive subjects, including one who was diagnosed with cancer, revealed matching mutations suggesting that the ctDNA could have been derived from clonal hematopoiesis.

conclusionThe observed false positive rate of ctDNA on a 96-mutation assay in an asymptomatic high-risk population is much greater than the true positive rate, limiting its usefulness as a cancer screening tool in its current form.

Indexed as

biomarkerscancerCell-free DNAcirculating tumor DNAearly detection of cancerliquid biopsymutation

Identifiers

PMID29531639
PMCPMC5840340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.