ReviewBiomicrofluidics2018
Dielectrophoresis-based microfluidic platforms for cancer diagnostics.
Review in Biomicrofluidics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Label-Free Cancer Detection Methods Based on Biophysical Cell Phenotypes.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- On-chip dielectrophoretic device for cancer cell manipulation: A numerical and artificial neural network study.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Article
- Review
- A comprehensive review on advancements in tissue engineering and microfluidics toward kidney-on-chip.Biomicrofluidics · 2022Review
- Characterization of Extra-Cellular Vesicle Dielectrophoresis and Estimation of Its Electric Properties.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Recent Advances in Microfluidic Platform for Physical and Immunological Detection and Capture of Circulating Tumor Cells.Biosensors · 2022Review
- Review
- Integration of a Dielectrophoretic Tapered Aluminum Microelectrode Array with a Flow Focusing Technique.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Microscale nonlinear electrokinetics for the analysis of cellular materials in clinical applications: a review.Mikrochimica acta · 2021Review
- A Prominent Cell Manipulation Technique in BioMEMS: Dielectrophoresis.Micromachines · 2020Review
- A dynamically deformable microfilter for selective separation of specific substances in microfluidics.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- Scalable Signature-Based Molecular Diagnostics Through On-chip Biomarker Profiling Coupled with Machine Learning.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2020Review
- Detection of Rare Objects by Flow Cytometry: Imaging, Cell Sorting, and Deep Learning Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Dielectrophoresis of Amyloid-Beta Proteins as a Microfluidic Template for Alzheimer's Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
- Recent advances in microfluidic methods in cancer liquid biopsy.Biomicrofluidics · 2019Review
- Liquid biopsy: one cell at a time.NPJ precision oncology · 2019Review
- Review
- An integrated microfluidic platform for size-selective single-cell trapping of monocytes from blood.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
- Analysis of the dielectrophoretic properties of cells using the isomotive AC electric field.Biomicrofluidics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent advancement of dielectrophoresis (DEP)-enabled microfluidic platforms is opening new opportunities for potential use in cancer disease diagnostics. DEP is advantageous because of its specificity, low cost, small sample volume requirement, and tuneable property for microfluidic platforms. These intrinsic advantages have made it especially suitable for developing microfluidic cancer diagnostic platforms. This review focuses on a comprehensive analysis of the recent developments of DEP enabled microfluidic platforms sorted according to the target cancer cell. Each study is critically analyzed, and the features of each platform, the performance, added functionality for clinical use, and the types of samples, used are discussed. We address the novelty of the techniques, strategies, and design configuration used in improving on existing technologies or previous studies. A summary of comparing the developmental extent of each study is made, and we conclude with a treatment of future trends and a brief summary.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.