Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531612›Full record

ArticleOpen access Macedonian journal of medical sciences2018

Angulated Dental Implants in Posterior Maxilla FEA and Experimental Verification.

Hamed A Hamed, Hamdy A Marzook, Nahed E Ghoneem, Mohamed I El-Anwar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access Macedonian journal of medical sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hamed A HamedFaculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Mansoura, Egypt.
Hamdy A MarzookFaculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Mansoura, Egypt.
Nahed E GhoneemFaculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, Egypt - Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Mansoura, Egypt.
Mohamed I El-AnwarNational Research Centre - Mechanical Engineering, Giza 12622, Egypt.
Mansoura University · EGNational Research Centre · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to evaluate the effect of different implant angulations in posterior maxilla on stress distribution by finite element analysis and verify its results experimentally.

methodsTwo simplified models were prepared for an implant placed vertically and tilted 25° piercing the maxillary sinus. Geometric models' components were prepared by Autodesk Inventor then assembled in ANSYS for finite element analysis. The results of finite element analysis were verified against experimental trials results which were statistically analysed using student t-test (level of significance p < 0.05).

resultsImplant - abutment complex absorbed the load energy in case of vertical implant better than the case of angulated one. That was reflected on cortical bone stress, while both cases showed stress levels within the physiological limits. Comparing results between FEA and experiment trials showed full agreement.

conclusionIt was found that the tilted implant by 25° can be utilised in the posterior region maxilla for replacing maxillary first molar avoiding sinus penetration. The implant-bone interface and peri-implant bones received the highest Von Mises stress. Implant - bone interface with angulated implant received about 66% more stresses than the straight one.

Indexed as

Angulated implantFinite element analysisMolarPosterior maxillaSinus

Identifiers

PMID29531612
PMCPMC5839456
OpenAlexW2787971202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.