Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531519›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of ageing2018

Validity of the EASYCare Standard 2010 assessment instrument for self-assessment of health, independence, and well-being of older people living at home in Poland.

Sławomir Tobis, Krystyna Jaracz, Dorota Talarska, Sylwia Kropińska, Ewa Zasadzka, Mariola Pawlaczyk, Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis, Ian Philp, Aleksandra Suwalska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of ageing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Determinants of Attitude to a Humanoid Social Robot in Care for Older Adults: A Post-Interaction Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sławomir Tobis1Department of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-3258
Krystyna Jaracz2Department of Neurological and Psychiatric Nursing, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Dorota Talarska3Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Sylwia Kropińska4Laboratory of Geriatrics, Department of Palliative Care, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Ewa Zasadzka1Department of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Mariola Pawlaczyk1Department of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Katarzyna Wieczorowska-Tobis4Laboratory of Geriatrics, Department of Palliative Care, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Ian Philp5Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Aleksandra Suwalska6Laboratory of Neuropsychobiology, Department of Psychiatry, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

EASYCare Standard 2010 is a brief instrument identifying concerns in health, functional independence, and well-being, from older persons' perspective. It has not previously been validated for self-assessment. Our aim was to determine whether self-assessment (EC1) can give comparable results to an evaluation performed by professionals (EC2), for older people living at home. The study included community-dwelling individuals (aged at least 60 years,

Indexed as

EASYCareFunctional statusIndependenceOlder peopleSelf-assessment

Identifiers

PMID29531519
PMCPMC5840086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.