Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531316›Full record

Trial reportBlood cancer journal2018

Rapid, real time pathology review for ECOG/ACRIN 1412: a novel and successful paradigm for future lymphoma clinical trials in the precision medicine era.

Rebecca L King, Grzegorz S Nowakowski, Thomas E Witzig, David W Scott, Richard F Little, Fangxin Hong, Randy D Gascoyne, Brad S Kahl, William R Macon

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood cancer journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Impact of Organ Function-Based Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: Who Gets Left Behind?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Cost burden of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rebecca L KingMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. rebecca.king98@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7132-0226
Grzegorz S NowakowskiMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Thomas E WitzigMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
David W ScottBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Richard F LittleCancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Fangxin HongDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Randy D GascoyneBritish Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Brad S KahlWashington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
William R MaconMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Funding

Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
ECOG-ACRIN Biospecimen Bank to Support NCTNU24CA196172 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON, Scott D Jewell · 2015 to 2026
$41.1M
Washington University/ Siteman Cancer Center Lead Academic SiteU10CA180833 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARTLETT, NANCY L, KOZOWER, BENJAMIN D · 2014 to 2018
$7.6M
Naional Cancer Institute, Naitonal Clinical Trials Network U10 Lead Academic SiteU10CA180790 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ALBERTS, STEVEN R, BOUGHEY, JUDY CAROLINE · 2014 to 2018
$6.6M
National Clinical Trials Network Research at the University of WisconsinU10CA180799 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ANDERSON, BETHANY M, KUSHNER, DAVID M · 2014 to 2018
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180790NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180799NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180833NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ECOG/ACRIN 1412 (E1412) is a randomized, phase II open-label study of lenalidomide/RCHOP vs. RCHOP alone in adults with newly diagnosed de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and requires NanoString gene expression profiling (GEP) for cell-of-origin testing. Because of high ineligibility rate on retrospective expert central pathology review (ECPR), real-time (RT) ECPR was instituted to confirm diagnosis and ensure adequate tissue for GEP prior to study enrollment. Goal was notification of eligibility within 2 working days (WD). Initially, 208 patients were enrolled, 74 (35.6%) of whom were deemed ineligible by retrospective ECPR. After initiation of RT-ECPR, 219 patients were registered. Of these, 73 (33.3%) were ineligible and were declined enrollment; 47 (21.5% of total) had an ineligible diagnosis on RT-ECPR, and 26 (11.9% of total) had inadequate tissue. Because the 73 ineligible patients were never enrolled, no study slots were "lost" during this phase. Notification of eligibility occurred in an average of 1 WD (Range 0-4) with 97.3% within 2 WD. This novel RT-ECPR serves as a model for future lymphoma trials. Real-time ECPR can help to reduce costs and ensure that study slots accurately reflect the targeted population. In the precision-medicine era, rapid collection of relevant pathology/biomarker data is essential to trial success.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMalePrecision MedicineBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID29531316
PMCPMC5849886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.