Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531247›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

High-sensitivity assay for monitoring ESR1 mutations in circulating cell-free DNA of breast cancer patients receiving endocrine therapy.

Laura Lupini, Anna Moretti, Cristian Bassi, Alessio Schirone, Massimo Pedriali, Patrizia Querzoli, Roberta Roncarati, Antonio Frassoldati, Massimo Negrini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Currently Applied Molecular Assays for IdentifyingInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Detection ofFrontiers in oncology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Laura LupiniUniversità di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Morfologia, Chirurgia e Medicina Sperimentale, Via Luigi Borsari, 46, 44121, Ferrara (FE), Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0150-9565
Anna MorettiUniversità di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Morfologia, Chirurgia e Medicina Sperimentale, Via Luigi Borsari, 46, 44121, Ferrara (FE), Italy.
Cristian BassiUniversità di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Morfologia, Chirurgia e Medicina Sperimentale, Via Luigi Borsari, 46, 44121, Ferrara (FE), Italy.
Alessio SchironeAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Divisione di Oncologia clinica, via Aldo Moro, 8, 44124, Cona (FE), Italy.
Massimo PedrialiAzienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Ferrara, Unità di Anatomia Patologica, via Aldo Moro, 8, 44124, Cona (FE), Italy.
Patrizia QuerzoliUniversità di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Morfologia, Chirurgia e Medicina Sperimentale, Via Luigi Borsari, 46, 44121, Ferrara (FE), Italy.
Roberta RoncaratiInstitute of Genetics and Biomedical Research, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Milano (MI), Italy.
Antonio FrassoldatiUniversità di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Morfologia, Chirurgia e Medicina Sperimentale, Via Luigi Borsari, 46, 44121, Ferrara (FE), Italy. a.frassoldati@ospfe.it.
Massimo NegriniUniversità di Ferrara, Dipartimento di Morfologia, Chirurgia e Medicina Sperimentale, Via Luigi Borsari, 46, 44121, Ferrara (FE), Italy. ngm@unife.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0007-1920

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Approximately 70% of breast cancers (BCs) express estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and are treated with endocrine therapy. However, the effectiveness of this therapy is limited by innate or acquired resistance in approximately one-third of patients. Activating mutations in the ESR1 gene that encodes ERα promote critical resistance mechanisms. Here, we developed a high sensitivity approach based on enhanced-ice-COLD-PCR for detecting ESR1 mutations. The method produced an enrichment up to 100-fold and allowed the unambiguous detection of ESR1 mutations even when they consisted of only 0.01% of the total ESR1 allelic fraction. After COLD-PCR enrichment, methods based on next-generation sequencing or droplet-digital PCR were employed to detect and quantify ESR1 mutations. We applied the method to detect ESR1 mutations in circulating free DNA from the plasma of 56 patients with metastatic ER-positive BC. Fifteen of these patients were found to have ESR1 mutations at codons 536-538. This study demonstrates the utility of the enhanced-ice-COLD-PCR approach for simplifying and improving the detection of ESR1 tumor mutations in liquid biopsies. Because of its high sensitivity, the approach may potentially be applicable to patients with non-metastatic disease.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCodonEndocrine DisruptorsEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHumansLiquid BiopsyMutationNeoplasm MetastasisPolymerase Chain ReactionCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCodonEndocrine DisruptorsESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alpha

Identifiers

PMID29531247
PMCPMC5847549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.