Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531220›Full record

ArticleNature communications2018

Disentangling the role of floral sensory stimuli in pollination networks.

Aphrodite Kantsa, Robert A Raguso, Adrian G Dyer, Jens M Olesen, Thomas Tscheulin, Theodora Petanidou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Mutualism has its limits: consequences of asymmetric interactions between a well-defended plant and its herbivorous pollinator.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aphrodite KantsaLaboratory of Biogeography and Ecology, Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, 81100, Mytilene, Greece. a.kantsa@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4586-1109
Robert A RagusoDepartment of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Adrian G DyerDepartment of Media and Communication, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, Melbourne, 3000, VIC, Australia.
Jens M OlesenDepartment of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 116, 8000, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1998-1083
Thomas TscheulinLaboratory of Biogeography and Ecology, Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, 81100, Mytilene, Greece.
Theodora PetanidouLaboratory of Biogeography and Ecology, Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, 81100, Mytilene, Greece.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1883-0945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite progress in understanding pollination network structure, the functional roles of floral sensory stimuli (visual, olfactory) have never been addressed comprehensively in a community context, even though such traits are known to mediate plant-pollinator interactions. Here, we use a comprehensive dataset of floral traits and a novel dynamic data-pooling methodology to explore the impacts of floral sensory diversity on the structure of a pollination network in a Mediterranean scrubland. Our approach tracks transitions in the network behaviour of each plant species throughout its flowering period and, despite dynamism in visitor composition, reveals significant links to floral scent, and/or colour as perceived by pollinators. Having accounted for floral phenology, abundance and phylogeny, the persistent association between floral sensory traits and visitor guilds supports a deeper role for sensory bias and diffuse coevolution in structuring plant-pollinator networks. This knowledge of floral sensory diversity, by identifying the most influential phenotypes, could help prioritize efforts for plant-pollinator community restoration.

Indexed as

AnimalsFlowersPhylogenyPlantsPollination

Identifiers

PMID29531220
PMCPMC5847531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.