Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531154›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Food for contagion: synthesis and future directions for studying host-parasite responses to resource shifts in anthropogenic environments.

Sonia Altizer, Daniel J Becker, Jonathan H Epstein, Kristian M Forbes, Thomas R Gillespie, Richard J Hall, Dana M Hawley, Sonia M Hernandez, Lynn B Martin, Raina K Plowright and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prioritizing surveillance of Nipah virus in India.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Mixed-species assemblages and disease: the importance of differential vector and parasite attraction in transmission dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Nipah virus dynamics in bats and implications for spillover to humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Ecological interventions to prevent and manage zoonotic pathogen spillover.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessing the direct and indirect effects of food provisioning and nutrient enrichment on wildlife infectious disease dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  20. Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host-parasite dynamics in wildlife.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sonia AltizerOdum School of Ecology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA saltizer@uga.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9966-2773
Daniel J BeckerOdum School of Ecology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4315-8628
Jonathan H EpsteinEcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY, USA.
Kristian M ForbesDepartment of Virology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-2112-2707
Thomas R GillespieDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Program in Population Biology, Ecology and Evolution, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7901-7248
Richard J HallOdum School of Ecology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Dana M HawleyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9573-2914
Sonia M HernandezWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Lynn B MartinDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5887-4937
Raina K PlowrightDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.
Dara A SatterfieldMigratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC 20008, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-5580
Daniel G StreickerOdum School of Ecology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.

Funding

Research Core (Developmental Research Project Program)P20GM103474 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI Jeffrey Good · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
Pilot Grants ProgramP30GM110732 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI QUINN, MARK T · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/8NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103474NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM110732Wellcome Trust 102507
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-provided resource subsidies for wildlife are diverse, common and have profound consequences for wildlife-pathogen interactions, as demonstrated by papers in this themed issue spanning empirical, theoretical and management perspectives from a range of study systems. Contributions cut across scales of organization, from the within-host dynamics of immune function, to population-level impacts on parasite transmission, to landscape- and regional-scale patterns of infection. In this concluding paper, we identify common threads and key findings from author contributions, including the consequences of resource subsidies for (i) host immunity; (ii) animal aggregation and contact rates; (iii) host movement and landscape-level infection patterns; and (iv) interspecific contacts and cross-species transmission. Exciting avenues for future work include studies that integrate mechanistic modelling and empirical approaches to better explore cross-scale processes, and experimental manipulations of food resources to quantify host and pathogen responses. Work is also needed to examine evolutionary responses to provisioning, and ask how diet-altered changes to the host microbiome influence infection processes. Given the massive public health and conservation implications of anthropogenic resource shifts, we end by underscoring the need for practical recommendations to manage supplemental feeding practices, limit human-wildlife conflicts over shared food resources and reduce cross-species transmission risks, including to humans.This article is part of the theme issue 'Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host-parasite dynamics in wildlife'.

Indexed as

Host-Parasite InteractionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsAnimal FeedAnimalsAnimals, WildBehavior, AnimalCommunicable DiseasesConservation of Natural ResourcesEpidemiological MonitoringHumansImmunity, InnatePopulation DynamicsRisk Factorsanthropogenic changecross-species transmissionhuman feeding of wildlifepathogen transmissionresource subsidywithin-host dynamics

Identifiers

PMID29531154
PMCPMC5881886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.