Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531149›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Responses of migratory species and their pathogens to supplemental feeding.

Dara A Satterfield, Peter P Marra, T Scott Sillett, Sonia Altizer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. An ecological cascade links climatic variability to avian irruptions and zoonotic salmonellosis outbreaks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Gaps in modelling animal migration with evolutionary game theory: infection can favour the loss of migration.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. First records of prevalence and diversity of avian haemosporidia in snipe species (genusInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Assessing the Food Safety Risk Posed by Birds Entering Leafy Greens Fields in the US Southwest.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Living with liver flukes: Does migration matter?International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2020
    Article
  19. A stochastic differential game approach toward animal migration.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2019
    Article
  20. Food for contagion: synthesis and future directions for studying host-parasite responses to resource shifts in anthropogenic environments.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dara A SatterfieldMigratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA dara.satterfield@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3036-5580
Peter P MarraMigratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA.
T Scott SillettMigratory Bird Center, Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, National Zoological Park, Washington, DC, USA.
Sonia AltizerOdum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9966-2773

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Migratory animals undergo seasonal and often spectacular movements and perform crucial ecosystem services. In response to anthropogenic changes, including food subsidies, some migratory animals are now migrating shorter distances or halting migration altogether and forming resident populations. Recent studies suggest that shifts in migratory behaviour can alter the risk of infection for wildlife. Although migration is commonly assumed to enhance pathogen spread, for many species, migration has the opposite effect of lowering infection risk, if animals escape from habitats where pathogen stages have accumulated or if strenuous journeys cull infected hosts. Here, we summarize responses of migratory species to supplemental feeding and review modelling and empirical work that provides support for mechanisms through which resource-induced changes in migration can alter pathogen transmission. In particular, we focus on the well-studied example of monarch butterflies and their protozoan parasites in North America. We also identify areas for future research, including combining new technologies for tracking animal movements with pathogen surveillance and exploring potential evolutionary responses of hosts and pathogens to changing movement patterns. Given that many migratory animals harbour pathogens of conservation concern and zoonotic potential, studies that document ongoing shifts in migratory behaviour and infection risk are vitally needed.This article is part of the theme issue 'Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host-parasite dynamics in wildlife'.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimal MigrationAnimalsAnimals, WildApicomplexaBirdsButterfliesChiropteraDeerEcosystemHost-Parasite InteractionsHost-Pathogen InteractionsNorth AmericaPopulation DynamicsSeasonsSouth AmericaDanaus plexippushost–parasite interactionspathogenresidentseasonal migrationsupplemental feeding

Identifiers

PMID29531149
PMCPMC5883000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.