Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531146›Full record

ReviewPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2018

Health hazards to wild birds and risk factors associated with anthropogenic food provisioning.

Becki Lawson, Robert A Robinson, Mike P Toms, Kate Risely, Susan MacDonald, Andrew A Cunningham

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Occurrence ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complete mitochondrial genome and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. How to Start Up a National Wildlife Health Surveillance Programme.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Aspergillosis in Wild Birds.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Becki LawsonInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK becki.lawson@ioz.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1706-7140
Robert A RobinsonBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK.
Mike P TomsBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0823-5336
Kate RiselyBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK.
Susan MacDonaldFera Science Ltd, National Agri-Food Innovation Campus, Sand Hutton, York YO41 1LZ, UK.
Andrew A CunninghamInstitute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London NW1 4RY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3543-6504
British Trust for Ornithology · GBZoological Society of London · GBFera Science (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Provision of supplementary food for wild birds at garden feeding stations is a common, large-scale and year-round practice in multiple countries including Great Britain (GB). While these additional dietary resources can benefit wildlife, there is a concomitant risk of disease transmission, particularly when birds repeatedly congregate in the same place at high densities and through interactions of species that would not normally associate in close proximity. Citizen science schemes recording garden birds are popular and can integrate disease surveillance with population monitoring, offering a unique opportunity to explore inter-relationships between supplementary feeding, disease epidemiology and population dynamics. Here, we present findings from a national surveillance programme in GB and note the dynamism of endemic and emerging diseases over a 25-year period, focusing on protozoal (finch trichomonosis), viral (Paridae pox) and bacterial (passerine salmonellosis) diseases with contrasting modes of transmission. We also examine the occurrence of mycotoxin contamination of food residues in bird feeders, which present both a direct and indirect (though immunosuppression) risk to wild bird health. Our results inform evidence-based mitigation strategies to minimize anthropogenically mediated health hazards, while maintaining the benefits of providing supplementary food for wild birds.This article is part of the theme issue 'Anthropogenic resource subsidies and host-parasite dynamics in wildlife'.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnimalsBird DiseasesEpidemiological MonitoringHumansImmunity, InnateMycotoxinsPasseriformesPopulation DynamicsPoxviridae InfectionsRisk FactorsSalmonella InfectionsTrichomonas InfectionsUnited KingdomMycotoxinsepidemiologyfinch trichomonosisgarden bird feedingmycotoxinParidae poxpasserine salmonellosis

Identifiers

PMID29531146
PMCPMC5882997
OpenAlexW2792401064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.