Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29531100›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of family medicine2018

Use of Asthma APGAR Tools in Primary Care Practices: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

Barbara P Yawn, Peter C Wollan, Matthew A Rank, Susan L Bertram, Young Juhn, Wilson Pace

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of family medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Elevating the Importance of Asthma Care in the United States.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Is It Time for a Patient-Centered Quality Measure of Asthma Control?The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara P YawnDepartment of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota byawn47@gmail.com.
Peter C WollanDepartment of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota.
Matthew A RankDivision of Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Susan L BertramDepartment of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota.
Young JuhnDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Asthma Epidemiology Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Wilson PaceNational Research Network, American Academy of Family Physicians, Leawood, Kansas.
Olmsted Medical Center · USAmerican Academy of Family Physicians · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Identification and characterization of children with asthma-associated comorbidities through computational and immune phenotypingR01HL126667 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JUHN, YOUNG J, LIU, HONGFANG · 2015 to 2022
$4.3M
Enhanced Ascertainment of Asthma Status Via Natural Language ProcessingR21AI116839 · NIAID · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JUHN, YOUNG J, WU, STEPHEN TZE-INN · 2015 to 2016
$437k
Bending the asthma cost curve: Is optimizing medication the answer?R03HS022126 · AHRQ · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI RANK, MATTHEW A · 2013 to 2013
$99k
AHRQ HHS R03 HS022126NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126667NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI116839
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess patient and practice outcomes after introducing the Asthma APGAR (Activities, Persistent, triGGers, Asthma medications, Response to therapy) tools into primary care practices.

methodsWe used a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled design in 18 US family medicine and pediatric practices to compare outcomes in patients with persistent asthma aged 5 to 45 years after introduction of the Asthma APGAR tools vs usual care. Patient outcomes included asthma control, quality of life, and emergency department (ED), urgent care, and inpatient hospital visits. The practice outcome was adherence to asthma guidelines.

resultsWe enrolled 1,066 patients: 245 children, 174 adolescents, and 647 adults. Sixty-five percent (692 patients) completed both baseline and 12-month questionnaires, allowing analysis for patient-reported outcomes. Electronic health record data were available for 1,063 patients (99.7%) for practice outcomes. The proportion of patients reporting an asthma-related ED, urgent care, or hospital visit in the final 6 months of the study was lower in the APGAR practices vs usual care practices (10.6% vs 20.9%,

conclusionsIntroduction of the Asthma APGAR tools improves rates of asthma control; reduces asthma-related ED, urgent care, and hospital visits; and increases practices' adherence to asthma management guidelines.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmbulatory CareAsthmaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Over StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalFamily PracticeFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMinnesotaasthmaasthma controlasthma managementasthma toolguidelineimplementationoutcomespractice-based researchpragmatic researchprimary careprotocolrandomized clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID29531100
PMCPMC5847347
OpenAlexW2792410304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.