Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29530921›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2018

Impact of issuing longer- versus shorter-duration prescriptions: a systematic review.

Sarah King, Céline Miani, Josephine Exley, Jody Larkin, Anne Kirtley, Rupert A Payne

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Variation in duration of repeat prescriptions: a primary care cohort study in England.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Hypertension care during the COVID-19 pandemic in an integrated health care system.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Household storage of pharmaceutical products in Saudi Arabia; A call for utilising smart packaging solutions.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Article
  17. Levothyroxine prescriptions trends may indicate a downtrend in prescribing.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah KingWestbrook Centre, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK.
Céline MianiDepartment of Epidemiology and International Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Josephine ExleyCambridge Centre for Health Services Research, RAND Europe, Cambridge, UK.
Jody LarkinRAND Pittsburgh, US.
Anne KirtleyWellcome Trust, London, UK.
Rupert A PayneUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-term conditions place a substantial burden on primary care services, with drug therapy being a core aspect of clinical management. However, the ideal frequency for issuing repeat prescriptions for these medications is unknown.

aimTo examine the impact of longer-duration (2-4 months) versus shorter-duration (28-day) prescriptions. DESIGN AND

settingSystematic review of primary care studies.

methodScientific and grey literature databases were searched from inception until 21 October 2015. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials and observational studies that examined longer prescriptions (2-4 months) compared with shorter prescriptions (28 days) in patients with stable, chronic conditions being treated in primary care. Outcomes of interest were: health outcomes, adverse events, medication adherence, medication wastage, professional administration time, pharmacists' time and/or costs, patient experience, and patient out-of-pocket costs.

resultsFrom a search total of 24 876 records across all databases, 13 studies were eligible for review. Evidence of moderate quality from nine studies suggested that longer prescriptions are associated with increased medication adherence. Evidence from six studies suggested that longer prescriptions may increase medication waste, but results were not always statistically significant and were of very low quality. No eligible studies were identified that measured any of the other outcomes of interest, including health outcomes and adverse events.

conclusionThere is insufficient evidence relating to the overall impact of differing prescription lengths on clinical and health service outcomes, although studies do suggest medication adherence may improve with longer prescriptions. UK recommendations to provide shorter prescriptions are not substantiated by the current evidence base.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesPrimary Health CareChronic DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug PrescriptionsHumansPractice Patterns, Physicians'Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdommedication adherencemedication wasteprescription lengthprimary carerepeat prescribingstable, chronic conditionssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29530921
PMCPMC5863683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.