Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29530905›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Feasibility of a blended group treatment (bGT) for major depression: uncontrolled interventional study in a university setting.

Raphael Schuster, Isabelle Fichtenbauer, Verena Maria Sparr, Thomas Berger, Anton-Rupert Laireiter

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05464121 (A Blended Intervention for Adjustment Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05464121 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Blended Intervention for Adjustment Disorder: Feasibility Trial and Preliminary Effectiveness.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Jaume IRan2022 to 2025Enrolled41ConditionsAdjustment DisordersArms• Blended treatment for AjD combining a self-applied Internet-based program (TAO) with face-to-face sessions via videoconference.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raphael SchusterDepartment of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-6447-9132
Isabelle FichtenbauerDepartment of Applied Psychology: Health, Development and Promotion, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Verena Maria SparrDepartment of Applied Psychology: Health, Development and Promotion, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Thomas BergerDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2432-7791
Anton-Rupert LaireiterDepartment of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigated the feasibility of a novel blended (face-to-face and computer-based) group intervention for the reduction of depressive symptoms in major depression.

designPatient-centred uncontrolled interventional study.

settingUniversity setting in a general community sample. A multimodal recruitment strategy (public health centres and public areas) was applied.

participantsBased on independent interviews, 26 participants, diagnosed with major depressive disorder (81% female; 23% comorbidity >1 and 23% comorbidity >2), entered treatment.

interventionAcceptance and mindfulness based, as well as self-management and resource-oriented psychotherapy principles served as the theoretical basis for the low-threshold intervention. The blended format included face-to-face sessions, complemented with multimedia presentations and a platform featuring videos, online work sheets, an unguided group chat and remote therapist-patient communication.

main outcome measuresThe Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression scale and the 12-item General Health Questionnaire.

resultsLarge to very large within group effect sizes were found on self-reported depression (

conclusionThe investigated blended group format seems feasible for the reduction of depressive symptoms in major depression. The development of blended interventions can benefit from assuring that highly structured treatments actually meet patients' needs. As a next step, the intervention should be tested in comparative trials in routine care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00010894; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyMental Health ServicesTherapy, Computer-AssistedUniversitiesAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedMindfulnessOutcome Assessment, Health CareYoung Adultblended group therapyblended therapydepressiongroup therapyonline interventionstherapeutic factors

Identifiers

PMID29530905
PMCPMC5857649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.