Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29530893›Full record

ReviewCirculation2018

Exercise Therapy and Cardiovascular Toxicity in Cancer.

Jessica M Scott, Tormod S Nilsen, Dipti Gupta, Lee W Jones

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04337736 (The Impact of Different Physical Exercise Protocols on Cardio-vascular Efficiency and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 126 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
126citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
19.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04337736 nacompletednot on this map

The Impact of Different Physical Exercise Protocols on Cardio-vascular Efficiency and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorITAB - Institute for Advanced Biomedical TechnologiesRan2016 to 2020Enrolled57ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsPhysical exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

126 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 245 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Guideline
  9. Guideline
  10. Efficacy of Exercise Therapy on Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. The impact of multimodal high intensity exercise program comparing online and onsite interventions in breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Variability in resistance training trajectories of breast cancer patients undergoing therapy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Thirty-second sit-to-stand test as an alternative for estimating peak oxygen uptake and 6-min walking distance in women with breast cancer: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Trial

66 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica M ScottDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.M.S., D.G., L.W.H.). scottj1@mskcc.org.
Tormod S NilsenDepartment of Physical Performance, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway (T.S.N.).
Dipti GuptaDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.M.S., D.G., L.W.H.).
Lee W JonesDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (J.M.S., D.G., L.W.H.).
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNorwegian School of Sport Sciences · NO

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Elisa de Stanchina · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardio-oncology is an emerging discipline focused predominantly on the detection and management of cancer treatment-induced cardiac dysfunction (cardiotoxicity), which predisposes to development of overt heart failure or coronary artery disease. The direct adverse consequences, as well as those secondary to anticancer therapeutics, extend beyond the heart, however, to affect the entire cardiovascular-skeletal muscle axis (ie, whole-organism cardiovascular toxicity). The global nature of impairment creates a strong rationale for treatment strategies that augment or preserve global cardiovascular reserve capacity. In noncancer clinical populations, exercise training is an established therapy to improve cardiovascular reserve capacity, leading to concomitant reductions in cardiovascular morbidity and its attendant symptoms. Here, we overview the tolerability and efficacy of exercise on cardiovascular toxicity in adult patients with cancer. We also propose a conceptual research framework to facilitate personalized risk assessment and the development of targeted exercise prescriptions to optimally prevent or manage cardiovascular toxicity after a cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCardiotoxicityCardiovascular DiseasesExercise TherapyHealth StatusHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agentscardiorespiratory fitnesscardiotoxicityexerciseheart failuresurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID29530893
PMCPMC6028047
OpenAlexW2793682287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.