Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29530670›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2018

Policy change is not enough: engaging provider champions on immediate postpartum contraception.

Ekwutosi M Okoroh, Debra J Kane, Rebekah E Gee, Lyn Kieltyka, Brittni N Frederiksen, Katharyn M Baca, Kristin M Rankin, David A Goodman, Charlan D Kroelinger, Wanda D Barfield

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Increasing access to immediate postpartum contraceptive implants: a prospective clinical trial among patients with opioid use disorder.The European journal of contraception & reproductive health care : the official journal of the European Society of Contraception · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ekwutosi M OkorohDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; Louisiana Department of Health, Medicaid Quality Management, Statistics and Reporting, Baton Rouge, LA.
Debra J KaneDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; Iowa Department of Public Health, Bureau of Family Health, Des Moines, IA.
Rebekah E GeeLouisiana Department of Health, Medicaid Quality Management, Statistics and Reporting, Baton Rouge, LA; Louisiana State University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and School of Public Health, New Orleans, LA.
Lyn KieltykaDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; Louisiana Department of Health, Bureau of Family Health, New Orleans, LA.
Brittni N FrederiksenDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA; Iowa Department of Public Health, Bureau of Family Health, Des Moines, IA.
Katharyn M BacaLouisiana Department of Health, Bureau of Family Health, New Orleans, LA.
Kristin M RankinDivision of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
David A GoodmanDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Charlan D KroelingerDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
Wanda D BarfieldDivision of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion · USLouisiana State Department of Health and Hospitals · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates of short-interval pregnancies that result in unintended pregnancies remain high in the United States and contribute to adverse reproductive health outcomes. Long-acting reversible contraception methods have annual failure rates of <1%, compared with 9% for oral contraceptive pills, and are an effective strategy to reduce unintended pregnancies. To increase access to long-acting reversible contraception in the immediate postpartum period, several State Medicaid programs, which include those in Iowa and Louisiana, recently established reimbursement policies to remove the barriers to reimbursement of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception insertion. We used a mixed-methods approach to analyze 2013-2015 linked Medicaid and vital records data from both Iowa and Louisiana and to describe trends in immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception provision 1 year before and after the Medicaid reimbursement policy change. We also used data from key informant interviews with state program staff to understand how provider champions affected policy uptake. We found that the monthly average for the number of insertions in Iowa increased from 4.6 per month before the policy to 6.6 per month after the policy; in Louisiana, the average number of insertions increased from 2.6 per month before the policy to 45.2 per month. In both states, the majority of insertions occurred at 1 academic/teaching hospital. In Louisiana, the additional increase may be due to the engagement of a provider champion who worked at both the state and facility level. Recruiting, training, engaging, and supporting provider champions, as facilitators, with influence at state and facility levels, is an important component of a multipart strategy for increasing successful implementation of state-level Medicaid payment reform policies that allow reimbursement for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception insertions.

Indexed as

Health PolicyPostpartum PeriodBirth IntervalsFemaleHumansIowaLong-Acting Reversible ContraceptionLouisianaMedicaidPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedReimbursement MechanismsUnited Stateschampioninsertionsinter-pregnancy intervalslong acting reversible contraceptionMedicaidpolicypostpartumpregnancy spacingprovider championsprovidersreimbursement policystateuptake

Identifiers

PMID29530670
PMCPMC5970075
OpenAlexW2792752425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.